OT More nuclear waste problems.

formatting link

These people just don't want to deal with nuclear waste properly.

Reply to
harry
Loading thread data ...

Again, it is waste from a nuclear weapons programme, not from nuclear power. We all know that, because of the pressures to get the weapons developed, the early nuclear weapons programmes cut corners.

Reply to
Nightjar

And of course in reality it was only a 'problem' for Guardian readers

"There was no spread of contamination after the partial tunnel collapse or during the emergency response work to fill the hole in the tunnel, and no workers were injured in the incident or the response."

formatting link

In short its about as exciting as a child falling of a swing and bruising its knee in a village playground.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

It's a long-closed site, last used in 1988. The waste is a legacy of the rush to make plutonium for nuclear weapons in the latter part of the last century, much like the legacy waste at Sellafield. Burying the Purex waste in situ at Hanford is being considered anyway. Irrelevant to the waste from nuclear power stations of today.

formatting link

Reply to
Chris Hogg

Surely if we can make solar cells work from the sun we ought to be able to make some form of cell that works from the radiation from waste? Brian

Reply to
Brian Gaff

well of course you can, but radiation from waste is a bit like a candle

5 miles away compared with the sun..

it takes a heck of a lot of radiation to boil water in a reactor..

there's not a lot of energy in a random bit of plutonium decaying

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

300kV radioisotope batteries exist. So do thermal decay powered generators. The output is tiddly.

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

+1

You beat me to the WNN link!

Reply to
newshound

En el artículo , Nightjar escribió:

You mustn't confuse poor harry with facts.

Reply to
Mike Tomlinson

Have you looked up what sort of radiation that is and therefore how that might work?

Reply to
Tim Streater

Didn't the USSR use Pl reactors for remote weather stations ? A la "The Martian" ?

Reply to
Jethro_uk

Bryan reminds me of myself at 7 years old.

I built two shafts with step up gears going to each one from the other.

My idea was that I had invented a perpetual motion machine

It took me some time to figure out why it just locked up solid

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

yes, because the mouse in a treadmill needed feeding

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Don't worry, he wouldn't recognise a fact if it bit him.

Reply to
Nightjar

I suggest it will be a very major operation to extricate this train from a collapsed tunnel. And expensive.

Reply to
harry

Very good. Now the permanent solution?

Reply to
harry

tjar

It hardly matters where it's come from. It still has to be dealt with. And still they pile up more and more.

Reply to
harry

formatting link

Reply to
newshound

Not quite, they used Strontium 90. But plutonium generators have been used for a number of "deep space" probes.

formatting link

Reply to
newshound

Harry. In this life there are no permanent solutions.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.