The people who may have known about it and said nothing were complicit in a crime and also showed a dereliction of duty.
At the very least they should be removed from an office of trust and replaced with real carers.
TV show floor attendants and cameramen are now "carers" or in "offices of trust"?
Most of the people involved at Broadmoor and at Stoke Mandeville in the '70s will have retired or died by now anyway. They may well be involved in the current OAP care problems as victims themselves. which could possibly be considered to be poetic justice.
Alan Turing was arrested and came to trial on 31 March 1952, after the police learned of his sexual relationship with a young Manchester man.
He made no serious denial or defence, instead telling everyone that he saw no wrong with his actions. He was particularly concerned to be open about his sexuality even in the hard and unsympathetic atmosphere of Manchester engineering.
Rather than go to prison he accepted, for the period of a year, injections of oestrogen intended to neutralise his libido.
You are ignorant and parochial. You have no idea what goes on in the rest of the world.
Back then it wasn't criminal though was it? And we didn't have a lot of this drivelish law devised by lawyers so they could make money. The scum are positively salivating at the thought of all the "compo" claims we shall have no doubt. These are the real parasites in our society.
So anything that is not actually criminal is OK?
Salivating! - much as you feel about FIT?
Nor would having the death penalty for disagreeing with a dictator. So what exactly is your point? That some countries are lacking the basics of civilization? Or have you the sadly quite common male view that all females are begging for it - and if the man gets pleasure from an act of abuse, the female must too?
So that makes what he did ok in your view?
I'm now fully aware that Harry is a bit of a half-wit himself. Quite what bit, I dread to think.
There's another fiddling old bastard now.
I'm not advocating what did you dope. I'm just pointing out that it's a cultural thing and that's all. But here's no doubt there are lots of people getting on the bandwagon and lots no doubt will be out to rob the licence payer for a compo job. No doubt there will be lots of scumbag solicitors ready to show them how.
Bye and large yes.
We have too much law. Created so the criminal lawyer class can rip off the population at large. As if we don't have enough with banksters.
Murder was OK before someone decided to create a law that makes it criminal? Go back a long way, if Adam had murdered Eve that would have been OK - but making love to her was against the law so it wasn't. Or even eating an apple.
You think a 'culture' that makes it ok for an adult to assault a child ok? Or ok to assault another adult? Of course they exist, but it says much about your thinking if you feel the need to mention them.
Please don't speak for others. You may have 'no doubt' but that is simply a guess. And designed to lessen the validity of genuine cases.
Harry didn't say it was OK, he said that some cultures think it is.
bloke after he abused someone by phone on air.
I don't think we need a public enquiry, what we need are more Rupert Murdochs.
Ah wait... fiddling with dead girls...
Hmmm...
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.