OT - generating electricity on a bicycle

My motor theory is fine, thanks for your concern.

Your understanding is more worrying where you claim your DC motors should not be supplied with DC.

Similarly if you don't know the difference between a unipolar motor and a ball bearing motor then you really ought to stop here.

Reply to
Fredxxx
Loading thread data ...

Love to see harry trying to send square wave AC over a distance. ;-)

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Indeed it can be regarded thus. The frequency in this case is zero.

Reply to
harry

formatting link

Reply to
harry

What relevance has that to the discussion?

Reply to
harry

That is about as relevant to Tim+'s post as:

formatting link

Reply to
Fredxxx

Why would it be alternating current is it never changes polarity? It does however indicate poor your poor understanding of basic electrics.

Reply to
Fredxxx

And that, in a nutshell, betrays your lack of understanding.

I asked you to tell me whether the motor I linked to was DC or AC, or what it was. You didn't respond.

I didn't look very hard.

THere are 'perpetual motion' machines that use the 'pressure of sunlight'. Too.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Modern bike lighting uses LEDs, so rectification does matter. (It's generally built into the light though, not the dynamo, so in that sense it doesn't matter.)

formatting link
has a illustration of that from a 1952 Sturmey Archer catalogue, and also describes use of a bridge rectifier to charge NiCds from a dynamo, the battery also acting as regulation for the dynamo output.

These days standlights generally use supercapacitors built into the lights though; it's only if you also want consistent output for something like a USB charger that cache batteries are used.

Reply to
Alan Braggins

Think that's wrong. The rectifier acted as a one way valve to prevent the batteries discharging into the alternator when stopped. The batteries were dry cells. The system would change over to battery when the alternator output dropped - ie when stopped. Accompanied by a considerable drop in light output. Fitted as standard on the Raleigh Superb. That heavy green bike your school teacher rode.

I don't think Ni-Cads were around in 1952 - at least at a price a cyclist would pay for.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

[...]

The 1952 illustration is labelled "Dry battery unit". The use of "a 6 volt (5 x 1.2v cell) nickel cadmium battery", also described on the same page, is not from 1952.

Reply to
Alan Braggins

Ah. Certainly when I was into bicycles in the 50s, the cells used were primaries. And the auto switching (which used a rectifier) exclusive to Raleigh. As I rather fancied the same idea on my Philips. But it is a long long time ago.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Well it's still DC isn't it

Reply to
tony sayer

Well it runs off DC;)..

Hence its a DC motor;!

Reply to
tony sayer

It indicates your poor understanding of elementary maths. I spent forty years working with electrical machinery.

Reply to
harry

I don't see any link.

Reply to
Fredxxx

Clearly you have forgotten all about your experiences.

Reply to
Fredxxx

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.