OT: Batteries for the grid - cost

Oct 07, 2020 Last reply: 6 years ago 94 Replies
Saved reading
Jump to replies (94)

The Aussie battery is around 200MWh and cost around A$90M, which is around £50M, according to Winky. So about 4Wh per £. Now, if we want the grid to run on batteries only for some days, what's the cost? For simplicity, lets say 5 days, i.e. 120 hours, and the average demad is 33GW. That's 33,000 x 120 MWh, so 3,960,000 MWh. Round that up a bit to 4,000,000 MWh. 4Wh costs a quid, so



4MWh costs £1,000,000. So 4,000,000 MWh will cost £1,000,000,000,000.

If anyone can see a flaw in that I'd be glad to hear about it. And it's 20,000 times bigger than the Aussie one.



I'd also be interested to know how much land it would take, if someone can figure that out.


I can't see a flaw there.

£1T can buy an awful lot of nukes

In practice I don't believe there would be an outage of such a magnitude. But you're right in demonstrating the futility of batteries.

The closest we might get to it is the sharing of car battery charges with the power network at peak times for some beneficial charge/discharge rate.

The area occupied by the Oz battery at Hornsdale is actually not very large, about 50 x 150 metres, 7,500 sq.m. or 0.0075 sq.km. See this Google map

formatting link
There is also stuff on the right, but I'm not sure what it is - switch or control gear perhaps - remember there's a wind farm right alongside which would need control gear, one of the windmills is visible in this picture.
formatting link

The UK area is 240,000 sq.km which allows you 12 sq.km for each of the

20,000 batteries. As they each only occupy 0.0075 sq.km, you could lose 20,000 of them without too much difficulty. Or put another way, if they were all packed together in one place, they'd occupy 150 sq.km, i.e. a block 12.25 km.square. That's a little bigger than Cardiff, at 140 sq.km.

I'd be interested to know how much land it would sterilise if it accidentally got shorted.

As much energy as a 4 megaton H bomb.

I did a similar calculation a while back and got 42,000 batteries needed, but I didn't then know the MWh capacity of Tesla's Oz battery, and assumed it to be 100MWh, half what you've used (yours is the correct figure), so taking that into account, our calculations agree but by different routes.

Its always a problem, that of energy storage, but most of the schemes I see do not support anything but a small area for a short time, and tend to use ex electric car batteries, lots of them. Second hand of course but cheap and still usable for a good number of cycles. Brian

For a renewables-only power generation system, such an outage would be a regular feature. We had one this year, in the latter part of January, when wind/solar were between them generating 1% at best of our requirements, for several days.

They're designed for different things. Hornsdale is intended for grid stabilisation and time shifting, ie very rapid response over a short time (minutes/hours). A battery designed for a 'power outage' of a week only needs enough power output to cover the peak.

Hornsdale has a 194MWh capacity with a 150MW peak output. Your hypothetical

4TWh battery would only need to cover a peak output of say 50GW.

Enormous numbers, but not as enormous as the 3TW you'd get from scaling up Hornsdale.

In reality, for this scale you'd probably be looking at flow batteries. It would be interesting to do the calculation of how much electrolyte you'd need and where you would put it.

Theo

You've been watching too much Chernobyl.

Now that is interesting. I only chose Hornsdale because it's the only largish battery I'm aware of, and I needed some numbers to start from. Are there any others, any that might match the requirement bettr?

Are there any such batteries in operation, do you know? Not on the scale needed for the UK, I'm sure, but possibly for isolated island communities that have no access to traditional generators such as coal, nukes or even hydro, but can only use diesel, wind and solar.

If you are paying a pound for 4 Wh I wish I was your supplier

I am far more scared of grid scale batteries and hydro schemes than any nuclear power station.

It's not cost per Wh. It's capital cost. Which will be amortised over lifetime recharge cycles, and combined with efficiency and operational costs to give Wh cost. Maybe 1000 charge cycles, 90% efficiency, + operational cost = ~50p per KWh. Looks ball park.

It's not cost per Wh. It's capital cost. Which will be amortised over lifetime recharge cycles, and combined with efficiency and operational costs to give Wh cost. Maybe 1000 charge cycles, 90% efficiency, + operational cost = ~50p per KWh. Looks ball park.

Yebbut, how would a short release all the energy at once, like a bomb. You would get a small local fire/blast and the rest of the system would shut down.

I see you can't read. A 70Ah 12v lead acid is around £70 for 840Wh. That is *lead acid* at a pound for 12Wh, for a dangerous battery than can explode if shorted.

An 11v 20AH lithium pack is nearly as expensive at £50. And that works out at about 4Wh per £

I'd say his figures are not far off.

he wasn't talking about supplies of 'electricity' but 'battery capacity'.

That doesn't sound right (by many orders of magnitude).

200MWh = 2 x 10^8 x 3600 ~= 7.2 x 10^11

TNT energy equivalent is about 4 x 10^9 per T

So it would be about 180T TNT energy equivalent but delivered on a diffusion limited timescale rather than as a supersonic detonation. A big bang but I'd be very surprised if there was a supersonic shockwave.

It would be a spectacular pale purple lithium fire though. The e-cigs go off exceptionally well as impromptu fireworks when overcharged. Sooner or later one *will* go pop and test their fire suppression system out.

Only the low yield W54 tactical nuclear warhead had such a low power.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required