Is Coniston and Coniston water in Westmoreland, or Cumbria?
In the case of the new unitarian political counties, where is it now?
TIA
Dave
Is Coniston and Coniston water in Westmoreland, or Cumbria?
In the case of the new unitarian political counties, where is it now?
TIA
Dave
Well as Westmoorland (note spelling) hasn't existed as a County since
1974, Coniston is in South Lakland, Cumbria.
I think it's Cumbria. IIRC, Cumberland and Westmoreland were merged in
1974.In message , Dave writes
Cumbria - and the old name was Cumberland.
In message , Dave writes
Presumably, by Cumbria you are referring to the old county of Cumberland. Cumbria is the modern administrative county
In answer to you question, Coniston and it's Water was in neither. It was in the Furness region of Lanacahsire - detached from the rest of the county. You can see an old map of the county on this page:
It's not a unitary authority, it's in South Lakeland Distict Council, Cumbria County Council areas
I was trying to go back to the old counties.
Dave
Coniston was in Westmorland (sorry I got it wrong earlier as well with oo not o but I knew the e wasn't right), Cumberland was a different county.
Cumbria is not the old Cumberland.
Wikipedia:
"The county of Cumbria was created in 1974 from the traditional counties of Cumberland and Westmorland, the Cumberland County Borough of Carlisle, along with the North Lonsdale or Furness part of Lancashire, usually referred to as "Lancashire North of the Sands", (including the county borough of Barrow-in-Furness) and, from the West Riding of Yorkshire, the Sedbergh Rural District."
Westmorland and Lakeland (sp)
Lakeland?
I have many ancestors from Westmorland so I still prefer to differentiate Westmorland from Cumberland for my family tree.
Lancashire until 1973, then Cumbria since.
Nice maps. What are the coloured regions? The commentaries suggest they are Parliamentary Constituencies from 1885, but
JGH
Rather than reply to the many posters, I am going to answer my own post.
A very many thanks to all who answered what I thought would be a simple question. It looks like it turned out to be a lot more complex than I thought.
Many thanks again.
Dave
Don't know.
Maybe old Metropolitan Boroughs?
No, it turned out to be a poorly-worded question. "Which historic (i.e., pre-1974) county _were_ Coniston and Coniston Water in? Was it Westmorland, Cumberland, Lancashire or Yorkshire? Following Local Government reorganisation of the last two decades, are they in a Unitary Authority or a County, and which one?"
Or you could have spent thirty seconds on Wikipedia.
More than 30 seconds on wiki told me absolutely nothing. The posters that did reply without scorn, have filled me in with all the details.
It's a matter of history.
Dave
Handsworth is presumably "Sheffield Attercliffe" (1885-2010) but it doesn't explain the absence of the other constituencies.
Looking at your quoted map and other maps in Yorkshire backs up your
1885 date but at that time some constituencies ceased to exist and other were created so the map seems to have errorsWhitby ceased to be a parliamentary constituency in 1885 (becoming Scarborough and Whitby) Howdenshire and Buckrose existed until 1950 Osgoldcross ceased to exist in 1918
Sowerby existed from 1885-1983 Holmfirth existed from 1885-1918
Transport links: The Woodhead tunnel, presumeably singular is shown so its post 1845 The New Junction Canal isn't shown so its pre 1905
There may be other clues in road, rail or canal networks.
That's the puzzle, in the currency of the map Handworth had nowhere near enough population to be a constituency, and the County Borough of Sheffield had five constituencies within its boundaries, Sheffield Attercliffe, Sheffield Brightside, Sheffield Central, Sheffield Ecclesall and Sheffield Hallam, more-or-less each of the townships in
JGH
What I was trying to indicate in my previous posting is that it's showing an almost impossible picture elsewhere in the county. It's pre 1885 and post 1885 on a random basis. The mapmaker implements some changes but either doesn't know or can't be arsed about including other changes so it could have nothing to do with constituencies.
Some other remote possibilities:
Could it have some basis in the structure of the courts and legal system or even the church?
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.