Not just Population -- it's the Behavior, too, Stupid!

Cyber Defense Confidence Ebbs as Ransomware Attacks Multiply By Rundle, Uberti & Stupp, May 31, 2022, Wall St. Journal

Despite Washington’s recent attempts to expand cybersecurity rules and disrupt hacking gangs, ransomware continues to proliferate and executives report unease about their companies’ ability to ward off the threat. The number of ransomware attacks against U.S. businesses has continued to increase this year, cybersecurity experts say, while some lawmakers warn the government has limited visibility of such hacks. Companies that rapidly digitized their operations during the pandemic are spending more time and effort navigating a fast-changing and treacherous ransomware landscape. About 19% of cyber risk executives are highly confident in their organization’s ability to understand and respond to cyber threats, according to a more than 660-person survey published Thursday by Marsh & McLennan Co.’s insurance broking business and Microsoft Corp.

“It reflects that, despite the significant amount of time and energy and resource that organizations are spending on cyber, the risk environment continues to evolve and expand such that it’s difficult to get ahead of it or get on top of it,” said Thomas Reagan, cyber risk practice leader for the U.S. and Canada at Marsh. Verizon Communications Inc.’s annual Data Breach Investigations Report, published last week, found that ransomware’s involvement in data breaches rose by 13% over the course of the past year, more than the increase in the previous 5 years combined. Many attacks remained relatively unsophisticated and largely relied on human error rather than technology prowess, said Sowmyanarayan Sampath, chief revenue officer at Verizon. “It’s not James Bond stuff,” he said.

The pandemic pushed many companies to reorient their security postures to protect employees working remotely and outside traditional corporate cyber defenses. That shift, coupled with the growth in criminal operations using ransomware, contributed to a sharp increase in such attacks during the pandemic. Criminal groups demanded ransoms as high as tens of millions of dollars to unlock some companies’ data, disrupting critical infrastructure operators such as Colonial Pipeline Co. and meatpacker JBS Foods SA last spring. The spate of incidents led Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Christopher Wray last year to compare the challenge posed by ransomware to that of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Researchers at security firm Sophos Inc. say as ransomware has grown more common, hackers increasingly are specializing in specific tasks, such as accessing computer systems or deploying malware, to work more efficiently. The upshot is that corporate security teams are “facing more attacks that develop at an accelerated pace,” leading to employee burnout and resignations, said Patrick Gaul, executive director of the National Technology Security Coalition, an advocacy group for chief information security officers. Washington has tried to meet the threat by collaborating more with corporate security teams and unveiling a menu of more aggressive standards for the public and private sectors. Regulators issued first-of- their-kind cyber rules for oil-and-gas pipelines, lawmakers passed new rules for critical-infrastructure firms to report breaches, and the Justice Dept and other agencies have stepped up their attempts to disrupt criminal groups abroad. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, or CISA, announced last week that it is setting up a task force on ransomware.

The govt likely knows about just 1/4 of such incidents due to underreporting by companies and disclosures spread across different federal agencies, according to a report last week by the Senate Homeland Security Committee. The lack of visibility blunts efforts to assist victims and obscures the full economic impact of ransomware attacks, the report found. Victims sent at least $692 million in cryptocurrency to virtual wallets affiliated with such hackers in 2020, according to Chainalysis Inc. The data-analytics firm, which tracks illicit payments across public ledgers known as blockchains, said in a February report that the 2021 total—$602 million—will likely surpass 2020’s sum as more digital ransoms are traced over time.

A top cybersecurity official in the Biden admin has said the onslaught has slowed in recent months during Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Speaking at the Cyber Initiatives Group’s spring summit this month, Rob Joyce, cybersecurity director at the National Security Agency, said repeated warnings by CISA helped businesses shore up their defenses against potential hacks. Sanctions imposed on Russia, where researchers believe many ransomware gangs operate, may have made it harder for criminals to cash out from successful attacks, he said. But cybersecurity experts don’t see this as a time to be any less alert. “If anyone thinks that ransomware attacks are decreasing or going away, I’d say that notion is absurd,” said Errol Weis, chief security officer of the Health Information Sharing and Analysis Center, a nonprofit that coordinates security among healthcare organizations. The NSA declined to comment. “Ransomware remains a threat that is affecting too many organizations,” Eric Goldstein, executive assistant director for cybersecurity at CISA, said in a statement.

formatting link

Reply to
David P
Loading thread data ...

Any business with more than a couple of PCs should be doing daily backups, leaving them with little vulnerability to ransomware.

Reply to
Animal

Firstly, I think there should be an attempt to stop the blame culture. Most people can be scammed given the correct technique. Criminals will get everywhere, as long as there is money to be made as we all know. De stigmatising it would go a long way toward getting it reported. The real dangerous people are those who are not in it for the money, but hose who use stealth to compromise data on people. Now the end game could still be financial but is equally as likely to be political in nature. There is no such thing as a totally secure system, since this would mean no human should ever be allowed to use it! After all, Guns don't fire themselves. Brian

Reply to
Brian Gaff

------------------- The attacks are a selfish decision at the expense of others. The political class is also making such selfish decisions, which cause conflict. The inner city gangs were saying 20 years ago that the government is the "biggest gang of all"! They should have a job requirement for regular attendance at spiritual recovery meetings, to learn to be more honest and less selfish! To get different results you have to do something different!

Reply to
David P

------- They would finally learn that extending life spans artificially by suppressing communicable diseases is a selfish decision at the expense of other critters, future generations, & the environment, & they'd realize that we need to enact NEGATIVE population growth to correct the problem!

Reply to
David P

----------------------- It's not just population numbers; it's behavior, too, stupid! It's emissions: The History of Carbon Dioxide Emissions May 21, 2014, By Friedrich & Damassa CO2 emissions from human activities are now higher than at any point in our history. In fact, recent data reveals that global CO2 emissions were 150 times higher in 2011 than they were in 1850.

How did we arrive at such an unprecedented – and precarious – state? We continue to updated Climate Watch, with CO2 emissions estimates, providing a rich data set that documents the historical growth in emissions throughout the world. The data also offers insights into related trends and drivers of emissions—including population growth, economic development, and energy use.

For context, at the beginning of this time period—1850—the U.K. was the top emitter of CO2, with emissions nearly 6 times those of the country with the second-highest emissions, the U.S. France, Germany, and Belgium completed the list of top five emitters. In 2011, China ranked as world’s largest emitter, followed by the U.S., India, Russia, and Japan. Tellingly, while the U.S. was the world’s 2nd-largest emitter in both years, its emissions in 2011 were 266 times greater than those in 1850.

formatting link
EVERYTHING ELSE, INCLUDING: The cause of soil degradation and how it affects us By Tammana Begum, 16 April 2021 Soil is not an inert medium but a living ecosystem that is essential to life. It takes hundreds and thousands of years to form an inch of topsoil, and many more centuries before it is fertile. While soil degradation is a natural process, it can also be caused by human activity. In the last few decades, soil degradation has been sped up by intensive farming practices like deforestation, overgrazing, intensive cultivation, forest fires and construction work. These actions disturb soil and leave it vulnerable to wind and water erosion, which damages the complex systems underneath.

Silvia says, 'Several practices associated with intensive agriculture, especially tilling, disrupt soil structure. They accelerate surface runoff and soil erosion, loss of organic matter and fertility and disruption in cycles of water, organic carbon and plant nutrients. These practices also have a major negative impact on soil biodiversity. 'When soil degrades, the processes that take place within it are damaged. This causes a decline in soil health, biodiversity and productivity, leading to issues at all levels of many ecosystems, and resulting in large environmental consequences such as floods and mass migration.' When natural land such as a forest is converted into farmland, it removes important nutrients and prevents the recycling and replenishing of organic material. It also reduces the amount of carbon the soil can store by 50-75%. With global warming being one of the biggest environmental crises of our time, this would be a giant step backwards.

Soil compaction occurs when there is a combination of wet soil and a heavy weight, for example unwieldy machinery in farming. Networks of tunnels and pores created by various organisms collapse beneath the pressure and air is squeezed out, threatening underground habitats and the availability of nutrients. Tilling soil also has similar results. Salination - salty water - is a result of excessive irrigation or extraction of groundwater in coastal areas. This can make some bacterial species inactive and can kill many other microorganisms. Without underground life, land would become barren. In a worst-case scenario, it can lead to desertification, where the soil is damaged beyond repair and nothing grows except a handful of plants that can handle very harsh conditions.

But it's not just agriculture that is to blame: increasing urbanisation also has a negative impact. The widespread use of tarmac and concrete prevents water from being absorbed into the ground. This results in the death of millions of microorganisms and can lead to water runoff in other areas where it may cause flooding and erosion. Soil degradation can have disastrous effects around the world such as landslides and floods, an increase in pollution, desertification and a decline in global food production. One of the biggest threats to our future food security is land degradation and the associated loss in soil productivity.

Areas that are most likely to be affected are developing countries which usually provide services and materials to middle- and high-income countries. Many of the people who live in low-income countries could be forced to leave their homes in search of safety and fertile lands, resulting in the loss of cultural identity as well as possible economic and political instability in other areas. Acknowledging soil for what it is and recognising the irreplaceable role it plays can help us change the way we care for it which is something that needs to happen now. Many practices can be changed to prevent, and in some cases reverse, soil degradation. These include simple acts such as leaving vegetation on soil to allow nutrients to return into the earth. Communities, farmers and corporations can be educated about sustainable practices to promote respect and responsibility for nature and reduce their carbon footprint. Education can also encourage individuals to grow their own produce, which can foster a curiosity and appreciation for nature, as well as motivate to protect the planet. It also alleviates some of the pressure experienced by farms to support an ever-growing population.

Other changes may be harder to establish, such as avoiding monocultures (growing one single crop in a large area), because that would require lots of farmers to overhaul the way they work. However, monocultures can be extremely damaging to the soil - growing the one type of plant in one area of soil means the same nutrients are continuously being absorbed, which eventually leads to depletion. Monoculture also makes soil susceptible to pests, pathogens and diseases which adapt to the unchanging environment and cause devastating destruction of crops. Farmers often end up using chemical products to fight pests and diseases, and fertilisers to try and encourage crops to continue growing. While this may work in the short term, it has bigger and wider consequences in the long run. Soil and food are contaminated with unnatural substances and the surrounding environment. This damages nature further and can cause sickness in both humans & animals.

formatting link

Reply to
David P

We've already done that with penicillin and things to stop STDs and the Covid vaccine.

Reply to
whisky-dave

--------------- Yes it would, but you've never investigated it enough to know that, because you're too busy blowing your horn about all the other stuff here...

Reply to
David P

---------------------- The behavior needed to change 50 years ago, when the scientists studying eco-footprint projections called for ZPG! But everyone ignored that and thought they could do whatever they wanted and get away with it, but they were wrong! That's how alcoholics and addicts think!

Reply to
David P

----------------------- Religions never worked for alkies/addicts too, but the

12-step recovery program DID, stupid!
Reply to
David P

--------------------- We've been adding 80 million per year, that's one billion every 12 years, since then, and will continue to do that, until we reach 10 billion, according to the United Nations!

Reply to
David P

Reply to
Animal

------------------- That's right, and you aren't, so you're not informed! Question: What is the value of an uninformed opinion? Answer: It ain't worth poop!

Reply to
David P

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.