Leaking roof, soon fix that!

formatting link
is an "artist" without a clue of what a leaking rook even looks like!

Reply to
John Rumm
Loading thread data ...

formatting link
> There is an "artist" without a clue of what a leaking rook even looks > like!

This is art on a flat roof

Reply to
ARWadsworth

T24gTm92IDQsIDY6MjOgcG0sIEpvaG4gUnVtbSA8c2VlLm15LnNpZ25hdC4uLkBub3doZXJlLm51 bGw+IHdyb3RlOgo+IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cudGVsZWdyYXBoLmNvLnVrL25ld3Mvd29ybGRuZXdzL2V1 cm9wZS9nZXJtYW55Lzg4NjkxNTQvQ2xlYS4uLgo+Cj4gVGhlcmUgaXMgYW4gImFydGlzdCIgd2l0 aG91dCBhIGNsdWUgb2Ygd2hhdCBhIGxlYWtpbmcgcm9vayBldmVuIGxvb2tzIGxpa2UhCj4KPiAt LQo+IENoZWVycywKPgo+IEpvaG4uCj4KPiAvPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT1cCj4gfCCgIKAgoCCgIKBJbnRlcm5v ZGUgTHRkIC0goGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuaW50ZXJub2RlLmNvLnVroCCgIKAgoCCgIKB8Cj4gfC0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tfAo+IHwgoCCgIKAgoEpvaG4gUnVtbSAtIGpvaG4oYXQpaW50ZXJub2RlKGRvdCljbyhkb3Qp dWsgoCCgIKAgoCCgIKAgoHwKPiBcPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0vCgpUaGlzIGNsZWFuZXIgc2hvdWxkIGJlIHBy b2NsYWltZWQgYSBoZXJvIG9mIHRoZSBhcnQgd29ybGQuCgpTdWNoIHN0ZXJsaW5nIHdvcmsgY291 bGQgb25seSBiZSBvdXRkb25lIHdpdGggYSBib25maXJlLg==

Reply to
Dom Ostrowski

formatting link

Yawn. Oh what a shame. Live with it, it's clean now.

Reply to
Davey

formatting link
>> There is an "artist" without a clue of what a leaking rook even looks like! > >

£690K 'kinell, I'm in the wrong game.
Reply to
The Medway Handyman

formatting link

Damp and feathery?

Reply to
Steve Firth

formatting link
>>> There is an "artist" without a clue of what a leaking rook even looks >> like!

However, this artist seems to have had the same problem with a Phillistine cleaner...

David

Reply to
Lobster

formatting link
>>>>>

Is that after the clean-up or has a prudish Google censored the view?

Reply to
Roger Chapman

formatting link
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is an "artist" without a clue of what a leaking rook even looks >>>> like! >>>

Seems unlikely to be down to Google!:

formatting link
(or )

David

Reply to
Lobster

formatting link
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

There nothing showing on google earth even when you look at earlier images (for the c*ck and balls on the roof that is)

Reply to
ARWadsworth

formatting link
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is an "artist" without a clue of what a leaking rook even >>>>>> looks like!

It was supposed to have been there a year before the owner became aware of it.

Reply to
Roger Chapman

formatting link
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is an "artist" without a clue of what a leaking rook even >>>>>> looks like!

So is it possible to see dated images for google earth other than the 'normal' view (and can you tell the date that image was created?)

Reply to
Lobster

snip

Yes, but to be honest I couldn't see how on the link you posted and I have yet to install GE on this computer.

IIRC what you get is the year of the image but from what I have seen in the past you are unlikely (as in I have yet to see) to see more than two earlier images.

Reply to
Roger Chapman

No that laurel goes to some div called Sachi. (For collecting all the local crap and setting fire to it.)

Unfortunately such efforts always fail, though we vigorously applaud the celebration of the man whose earnest endeavour earned him the place of honour for our best politicians.

I just wish we burned a real one each year.

Reply to
Weatherlawyer

formatting link
>> There is an "artist" without a clue of what a leaking rook even looks like! > >

Hah! Reminds me of a case a few years ago, a "conceptual art" piece, some sort of collection of bricks laid out on the gallery floor, was tidied away by a cleaner who thought they'd been left there by careless tradesmen.

But 690k sterling?? Are you 'avin a laugh?

Reply to
Gib Bogle

formatting link
>

Some of this art is 'priceless', or 'not worth anything', depending on your point of view. Me, I go for the latter. Bring on the painting chimpanzees!

Reply to
Davey

Best I saw was on the telly in the States. The "artist" had rented a Lear jet and had the pilot run the engines at low thrust. He then stood on the ground behind the plane and threw buckets of paint upwards. The paint was caught by the jet exhaust and thrown onto the canvass.

Reply to
Tim Streater

Derivative. What did he call himself - Jackson Pillock?

Reply to
Bob Eager

You've got to pay good money to make garbage. I took a photo of a patch of oil dripped on the ground yesterday, nicely showing the colour patterns that develop when it gets rained on. I wonder if I can sell it for =C2=A3=C2=A3=C2=A3=C2=A3s?

But the one that I did appreciate in the States was the blowing up of

3,000 disco records in Chicago in 1979.=20
formatting link
Reply to
Davey

Hah. Actually I'd like to have a Jackson Pollock on my wall.

Reply to
Gib Bogle

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.