Is this a record?

I just recieved an item of spam mail dated August 1996.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher
Loading thread data ...

Really dated? As in Received headers with antique dates?

Reply to
Tim Watts

Flog it on ebay. That's an antique, that is.

Reply to
Scott M

It wasn't offering shares in Netscape was it?

Owain

Reply to
spuorgelgoog

There are lots of old messages floating around from old dates, just keep an eye on the newsgroups, you'll see people responding to questions that are several years old, not realising. I think it's the electrons finally being shaken out of all the old telegraph lines.

Reply to
Davey

It usually seems to happen just after GG have changed their interface yet again.

Reply to
John Williamson

Probably. I keep well away from there.

Reply to
Davey

Here is the header with the personal info modified

From - Thu Apr 10 17:37:42 2014 X-Account-Key: account4 X-UIDL: 000094d94f407633 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-Mozilla-Keys:

Return-path: Envelope-to: me@mydomain Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:28:39 +0100 Received: from [70.39.76.189] (helo=smtp.aimgroupe.com) by my.relay with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WYHqA-0001q3-HQ for me@mydomain; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:28:39 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=aimgroupe.com; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; i= snipped-for-privacy@aimgroupe.com; bh=cctfxjtqTNdZg6zKIIqAMfMTCLQ=; b=cSLFAA5eo9+Hhlde+iWObpavbhh7YGv4UdYzaws5tjr472GnM/6J2nh2kmOK0fT5VfhOHWhFF7ZT USQdvuX23HUSyWPhbyTP13rwOic16DKE9jaTs+r1WsTLkeaEF4jHKfWo4FxO0XfmgjL2Y7uTjENM Z0cXXghrHQRkVHISFBw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=aimgroupe.com; b=mvv00CsMgKIxLGHrEDrqb9m1K4RQ0VfL/6Skskh4786I+qTD2AClbFR5NRIrnfPWq2etRtSQkp3l /NWY+AgZbI7N5FHXvNLlHNJAY8ShY+XVU0GnUHOGttFoTig8bjO2jVejBppQ6L7tkPrM2P7OjrhN rxorbRHblw/eCsnZ0oI=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="84fc9c79f9c30e59a72f0355fc7ecc4f50ab56be" Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 08:19:09 -0600 From: "Brenda Scherler" Reply-To: "Kelly Prepotente" Subject: Are these martha stewart pics real? Shocking confession To:

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Are you sure the date was real and not some kind of messed up host computer some place? Otherwise I'd imagine it would be rejected by some intermediate server. Brian

Reply to
Brian Gaff

That just means they wrote a crap Date: header... Now if one of the Received: headers had been prehistoric too :)

Reply to
Tim Watts

No it was faked (mail servers will sometimes add a missing Date: header but will not mess with one the client supplies).

Usually IME it's more like "1-1-1970" - It's a trick to get the mail to display at the top of your Inbox list.

Reply to
Tim Watts

Not a good idea since I read from the bottom and there are usually over

1000 items in it I haven't bothered to clear out yet
Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Perhaps it's a new internet meme - googling for messages people wrote in the same minute 18 years ago:

formatting link

Theo

Reply to
Theo Markettos

Was it dated using roman numerals ?

Reply to
whisky-dave

Too modern - try Mayan for a funky numbering system :)

Reply to
Tim Watts

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.