Drawing moisture out of cement

My son-in-law has bought a "build it yourself" "stone" firesurround, The instructions are not very clear. For setting the hearth on a bed of mortar it is a bit ambiguous as to whether wetting the stone is a good or a bad thing - it refers to one or the other drawing the moisture out of the mortar without it being clear as toy wheter this is a good or bad thing.

What would you suggest?

Reply to
DerbyBorn
Loading thread data ...

mortar needs to stay wet to set properly, so wet anything porous like bricks that it is to attach to

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

AIUI, it always a good idea to wet any surface that you're going to mortar, not excessively, but just so that the mortar 'takes' to it.

Reply to
Chris Hogg

If you wet the stone it won't absorb much water. The idea is that no dust will serve to work as a release agent as in mold release wax. With wet surfaces the lime carries around any dust particles and the bond is stronger.

Reply to
Weatherlawyer

Who mentioned lime?

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

That isn't how bricklaying and blocklaying is done.

Reply to
Mike Lander

+1. Cement needs to stay damp for a number of days to gain strength. OTOH if it's stone, lime would be a bit better.

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

Did the OP mention any other kind?

Isn't principle constituent OPC lime?

Reply to
Fredxxx

actually, it is if the bricks are really sucky.

But with average bricks you simply use a wetter mortar nix on the basis that some of the water will suck into the brick anyway.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

No.

The principle constitituent is Portland cement

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Drivel.

Reply to
harry

It doesn't want to be bone dry. But wetting it too much will cause unsightly cementy stains to appear on the face of the stonework as excess water runs down the face & spoil the appearance.

So, all a matter of degree.

Cementy marks can be removed with brickwork cleaner. (After cement has set). Be cautious as it's acid and can affect some stone (limestone).

Reply to
harry

They never are and block are a lot more sucky.

The consistency of the mortar is entirely determined by how it needs to be when doing the laying and that is determined by how it sags in use.

>
Reply to
Mike Lander

Exactly. if the bricks suck, you make it wetter so that once the bricks HAVE sucked, you get the right consistency.

Have you actually ever laid a course of bricks?

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

It is when I do it! Though it depends a bit on wind, temperature and humidity.

Reply to
Roger Hayter

If it *never* happens why would brick manufacturers or suppliers give instructions on how and when to do it?

"Only with high suction rate bricks in warm weather conditions should dunking (or wetting) of the bricks be considered. If it is undertaken the bricks should not be soaked and only clean fresh water should be used to avoid soluble salt contamination"

Reply to
Andy Burns

You don't in fact do anything of the sort because no bricks suck very much.

Lot more than one course thanks.

Reply to
Mike Lander

I doubt it, because I have laid with bricks that suck a HUGE amount

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Have a guess who you are replying to ...

Reply to
Adrian Caspersz

snip

Me too, especially with reclaimed bricks that might well have been locally made a long time ago.

Reply to
Roger Hayter

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.