B&Q Wind turbines

It's £12.00 per day BTW. And nurses coming off shift get fined 1 days pay if they don't move their vehicles quickly enough (say 'cos they went to the post office) .

If you refer to the old Edinborough R.I. I can assure you the premises (though quaint in an auld "Wee Scottty" sort of way) were totally unsuitable for a hospital in 2,006.

I liked the building BTW. Until I had to dismantle an instrument weighing 1,200 LBs at the top of one of the towers and take it down to the basement and re-install it into one of the labs.

The Lab boss said "We're no too sure aboot the floor, can you dismantle it piece by piece staying close to the wall (don't move it away from the wall in one piece) and take it down the steps".

Sure I can, just call me Indiana Jones.

Of course I jest, such is fairly normal for the NHS.

Who created that title ? Do I need to say more ?

Would you believe it if Arriva said Leeds was a centre of transport excellence ?

I think you will find (Should you chose to look) that significantly better medical services are available in the Scottish Highlands. They get more funding per patient (25% IIAC) and will pay airfares for patients to get to outpatients appointments. Better than crawling down Chapeltown Road. I think you know what I mean. :-(

BTW I was in Aberdeen R.I. on Wednesday and Dundee R.I. yesterday.

You have proof of that ?

Give over, it would have been the local, Regional Neurology Unit.

As regard Yorkshire, there is an excellent one in Sheffield.

One wonders why, (there might have been a good reason), since there is a perfectly adequate University, Medical school, and Neurology Department in Newcastle. IE.

*********************************************************************

Welcome to the Neurosciences Directorate of the Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust. The Directorate is made up of the Departments of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neuroradiology and Neurosurgery. The Directorate provides services to Northumberland, Tyne & Wear, Durham and North Cumbria. Some specialised services are provided for patients from all areas of the UK and abroad.

*********************************************************************

Significance = 0. Methinks.

Father in law died there of MRSA infection there in shitty squalor in

2,000. Deep gouges ran across the walls where beds had been pushed along. It is not possible to clean/sterilise a plaster surface broken like that. Disposable urinal bottles chucked out of windows into the quad, used syringes ditto. The lift was not cleaned in the 6 weeks we were attending there. Father in law fell out of bed 18 times in just 2 hours one Sunday afternoon because his bed could not be seen from his nurses workstation, oddly, *none* of the beds could. The wing was only built in 1972, the year we got married, how could it possibly be designed like that, there is no concievable excuse.

This is "Nursing" ?

The dirty bastards. !

And filthy wards catastrophic for others.

You neglect to mention what happened to the original "Chapel Alllerton" Hospital. Slight possibilty it was sold off for housing, what, what?

Tosh.

It's *MONEY* that directs it all.

There has been a titanic struggle in recent years between LGI and St James's to the detriment of patient care.

St James's has won, probably because of the open market value of the LGI site.

So it's Bye Bye LGI.

Killingbeck is already long gone, a fine hospital sold for housing.

Seacroft will not be long. :-(

DG

Reply to
Derek ^
Loading thread data ...

On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 21:48:54 +0000 someone who may be Derek ^ wrote this:-

Excellent, rudeness as well.

Reply to
David Hansen

On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 21:27:40 +0000 someone who may be Derek ^ wrote this:-

When people start off their replies with a personal attack like, "You really are a dim pillock.", the rest of their posting is not worth replying to.

Reply to
David Hansen

That's your opinion.

Where your position really needs defending people see it as a cop out

DG

Reply to
Derek ^

Rude, Moi ? Read it again.

DG

Reply to
Derek ^

I dunno. I find a statement that on the face of it appears to be a bald statement of fact, usually bodes well for the rest of the post.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

"The architect behind the eco-friendly makeover of David Cameron's house has admitted the wind turbine being attached to the Tory leader's roof is not as effective as was hoped.

..

Now Mr Michaelis himself has admitted their failings and Mr Cameron, who spent thousands on his model, may have to invest in a new one as early as next year. "It's early days for wind turbines and their efficiency can only get better," said Mr Michaelis, of architects Michaelis Boyd Associates in Ladbroke Grove."

formatting link
if the wind isn't there, buying a new one isn't going to make much difference.

And this is the leader of the party which promises to slash wasteful non-productive expenditure

Reply to
Tony Bryer

I don't care what he spends *his* money on. I only care about what he wants to spend *my* money on.

Reply to
Huge

If he can't look after his own money what chance do we have he'll look after ours? Not much I suggest. The man's a clown!

Reply to
Edward W. Thompson

Just as well he does not want to be chancellor then...

Reply to
John Rumm

He speaks highly of you.

Reply to
Andy Hall

More fuel for the debate, with emphasis on rooftop systems and their "capabilities" or lack of.

formatting link

Reply to
Matt

I could always sell you some wind, had a slight surplus over the last few days.

formatting link

Reply to
DJT

Also been a bit windy here:

formatting link
the 2006 to other year numbers back to 1999 for comparisons with other Novembers.

Reply to
Dave Liquorice

metres/sec?

What does the graph look like for the whole period so far?

I've looked through Steve Briggs's data in 10 minute intervals but the windspeeds are too low for most of the period. Bearing in mind my maths may be flaky but even so on the generous assumption 1kW was generated at 7m/s, cut in speed was 3m/s and cut out was 20m/s with a cube law obeyed in between it looked like a gross 500kWhr was available, 10% of this would be lost as the inverter's parasitic load, so a net value of around 35 quid. Now I need to super impose a typical demand to see how that could fit.

A substantially bigger turbine has recently won a German design prize.

formatting link

Reply to
AJH

the feature that impressed the judges - the ability to withstand high gusts while still generating electricity - is hardly new.

Reply to
Steve Firth

chafing dish!

Mary

Reply to
Mary Fisher

And I love the optimism:-

"Depending on location it produces between 5000 and 12000 kWh per year."

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

I see they listed it as good for one peron or couples ! not likley!! It wouldn't feed my 16st frame at one sitting !!!, best/cheapest BBQ is the trusty wheelbarrow few bricks and a couple of decent size wire racks, will take 1-2 full bags of charcoal and you can cook for 10 - 12 on it, top bannana

Reply to
Staffbull

B-)

I like the juxtaposition of the wind turbine or solar power kit with the

40 tonne airport fire engine with 1,000bhp engine.
Reply to
Dave Liquorice

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.