I heard of a school that acquired a double classroom of the portacabin type (two rooms and entrance ). The council's Works dept charged £20,000 for installing central heating!
I expect that when the summer comes they will need to install Air Conditioning.
Did it include a new or uprated gas or electricity supply to the building?
Also, as the work possibly couldn't be done during the day when the classroom was in use, or if pupils had to be excluded from the area of excavations, it might have to be done at weekends, at which case overtime will apply. In simplistic internal accounting terms, if the Works Dept charges £100 per hour for a digger + driver, the overtime rate will be £200 per hour, even though only the wage rate will rise from c. £8 to £16; the digger itself doesn't cost more.
It's not real money, it's only council money. The only time there is any relationship to the real thing is when the council tax bill goes up every year.
After all, compared to the cost of a shower cubical for a senior police officer, central heating for two classrooms for only £20k is a bargain.
Just typical of how the education budget and our poll tax is wasted with the nepotism, self interest, jobs for the boys, and inefficiency in local authorities. My son's primary school just bought 10 laptops, according to the head teacher the local eduacation authority instructed them to purchase from an "approved supplier". They paid £2200 each. I had a quick look at my favourite IT websites and the very same laptops could be had for £439. I was left wondering at how many books and other resources could have been purchased for the difference in price. The sad thing is we're paying for it all...
Ah well, there's been a stunning cockup with procurement for schools, and probably other stuff too.
The rules say publically funded organisations with a budget over X have to put everything out to competitive tender, or use a "Framework aggreement". See
formatting link
for an explanation - follow the links to the FOI request letter and the contract.
Unfortunately despite the good intent of putting it out to tender - competition meaning lower prices, better service, etc - the rules which accompany this make it work in the opposite way, such that the contracts end up being more restrictive and less competitive.
And that's the problem. Money is best spent when I spend my money on something I want, and worst spent when I spend someone elses money on something I don't personally care about.
And that's the fundamental reason the State spends our money so poorly.
This is how private schools do it as well. Zero to minimum government involvement.
Perhaps the public sector will take the hint that it is justifiably going to be recompensed below the rate of inflation. Of course the problem there is that anybody with genuine ability will leave and get a proper job, leaving ever worsening dregs.
What did they do with the wrong pupils? It's easy to do very well indeed if you cream off the middle class kids. It's the other lot that cost the money in the long term
yes, I realise that. It's simply that the HM has figured out that government involvement isn't useful and has done much better managing the setup herself as is done in the private sector.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.