Hi folk,
I have been using a Pur dispenser for a while - but now since I broke it have decided that rather invest in a new one, it was time to install a "real" carbon based faucet filter.
I am not interested in the ones that mount on the faucet and are in the way - and likely will constantly get things splashed up on them.
I want a high quality carbon based filter (under-sink) that will remove traditional contaminants (chlorine and lead), but also the more uncomon ones that while they may not be detectable today... They could still be in the water. (Mercury, Aresenic, MTBE, etc...) Before anyone asks - I have reviewed my city water report. While those ND contaminants are not reported - it still concerns me that they are there at very low levels, or can be leached from pipes (mercury perhaps?) or might slowly creep up to detectable levels over the next few years.
I am concerned that moving from a Pur dispenser - which does filter out arsenic (most likely due to long contact time with the water) to a higher water pressure carbon based system, which would let those contaminants pass through easily. (I do not want to go RO because it does remove some important things - Magnesium and Calcium, as well as Fluoride... But let's not even start a fluoridation debate :) )
Multi-Pure filters claim to filter out contaminants that no other filter seems to. And NSF.org seems to back them up. (
Can I get some unbiased comments?
Thanks,
Dirk