My neighbor had a new roof installed. There were two rows of asphalt
shingles on the roof, which is maximum allowed in our area (Upstate
Rather than have a complete tear off, the workers removed the top layer
of shingles, put felt paper down and then the new shingles.
It looks great and no leaks.
My question is has anyone had their roof done this way, and any regrets?
Being a general contractor, if you asked me to remove just the
top layer of shingles, I would charge you twice as much for
doing it, due to how much more difficult it is to remove just
one layer. I would never do that. If you are going to remove
shingles, remove them all. You can inspect the decking for
damage while it is all off.
When I did mine this summer I found a lot of sheathing with no spacers
on the long end. Explained some of the buckling in areas. Ran a sawblade
down the sides.
Hope it was the right thing to do??? Seemed to make sense at the time.
Dammit! Well, maybe I can do it from the attic side now.
You got it. 24" trusses on main roof and garage. Rafters on shed roof
areas and a piece of an L leg.
Until this project, I had only done a few small rectangular roof
sections. This house was 25 square. 2 story L shaped main roof with 2
valleys and a chimney I had to reflash. Then two car garage 25' deep.
Porch roof with shed wall at top and step flashing on one side. Two new
Anderson windows went in here too. Oh and replace rotten OSB under the
windows under vinyl siding. Other side of porch roof had valley to
garage. Ah then the family room shed style roof with two skylights and
lower chimney that also needed reflashing. It had step flashing on one
side with the garage as well. All new 8" drip edge (very Northeast) and
sticky-ass WSU at vallys and heated eaves.
This was a real roof. Got a new roofing nailer out of it anyway. Pretty
beat to shit now though...
I think the OP is simply trolling to see if this is a good idea for him
to do. No real roofer would do that. It would sure be a lot easier to
just remove both layers than to screw around trying to unstick the old
top layer from the dryrotted base layer.
On Dec 3, 3:34 pm, email@example.com (Bob) wrote:
Not a great idea. It saves on dump fees, a bit, but it isn't any
easier to remove one layer so it won't cost less, the new shingles
won't last as long as if they were put on a freshly cleaned deck, and,
as High Pockets Allison said, the stripped roof allows you to inspect
the roof sheathing and correct problems before they become major
Mine has two, maybe 3 layers on it. It's a bad idea no matter how you look
at it. It's cheaper up front maybe, but when it comes time to re-do it,
you'll more than double the cost since removing shingles is more time
consuming than putting new stuff down.
Bob if you are serious and not just checking covertly to see if you can get
away with that as a DIY job, here's the flaws.
1. If it leaked before, there is damaged wood. It may not have been 'bad'
but it's there. It's going to cost *much more* on down the road. Bad wood
will cause a sway in the roof and it will get worse. Looking at structural
2. If the roof has any sway in it now, it will get worse and be a much
larger job, plus the wood in the ceilings along the bottom of the attic will
start to go as well as the upper parts that hold the roof up. Once that
happens, you are looking at 10,000$ or more at the minimum.
3. Getting it properly done (remove all the shingles and have them inspect
the wood) costs *far less*.
I had to have mine done a cheaper way due to lack of money. I had the
backside of the house done, then later the front. The front needed only one
panel replaced (over garage) but the back needed 7 or 8 plus we had them
redo the panels on a few spots they said were 'ok, but it would be smart to
do those too as they were between ones being replaced'. 70$ per sheet was
all the extra cost as we did it EARLY ENOUGH before there were leaks. Since
that was 7 years and 5 years ago respective, the price is probably higher
now but we are good and got away with only 4,000$ or so for the whole job.
It would have been better to do both at the same time as we had to have the
top part '^' done twice that way but we used a very standard shingle so
matching was not a problem.
History of house showed it had had 2nd layer applied over origional roof
shingles. Estimate was that was about 10 years prior. Roughly 25 years
after house was built. Longer than normal on the first roof to last but
sometimes you luck up.
We are now watching our neighbors get jobs done but they are paying far
more, as in 10,000-25,000$ due to structural damage. See, they werent
'leaking in any obvious way so ignored the sways developing'. They are
having to have structural timbers replaced now and are real sorry they didnt
have a proper job done in the past before it got that bad.
Oh, I'm not a roofer by any means but I believe the ones we used were very
good, and that they were upfront and honest. You'll see some roofers here
and you can check this with them. Our cost was lower partly because it was
several years ago, and partly because the same contractor package dealed
other things like residing the house into the price (so each was discounted
due to volume of work).
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.