>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> On 2020-12-01 11:43, snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com wrote: >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Exactly what does "cheat-by-mail" mean to you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Same thing it means to you. You know exactly what
>>>>>>> I speak of.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What, that there was no fraud and there were no irregularities
>>>>>> with respect to vote-by-mail? Without actual, you know,
>>>>>> evidence, your assertions are just random hot air from an
>>>>>> anonymous fool on Usenet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You mean the same evidence (or lacktherefor) what the lemmings believe >>>>
>>>> No. I didn't say that. I meant evidence sufficient to convince
>>>> a court of law that fraud occurred. In sufficient quantity to
>>>> have affected the election.
>>>>
>>>
>>> And I agree that evidence is required, but the point is, the same
>>> applies to EVERY accusation. A person is believed to be guilty when
>>> people don't like him/her yet again, ignore the issue of those they like
>>> who have accusations against them, and many more. The level of idiotic
>>> hypocrisy is overwhelming.
>>
>> Indeed. Evidence needs to be forthcoming. And I do believe it
>> will when this hits the proper courts.
>
> Which courts are the proper courts?
>
>
Look the internet for a list