On the advice of counsel I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the 5th Amendment to the Constitution.

Exactly why Pfauci won't be prosecuted or convicted.

Pfauci's co-conspirators are too big to jail.

Seems to me if I remember correctly, in Left Wing China, the Party Members did not take their version of the not-a-real-vaccine vaccine either.

Nope:

AI Overview

Donald Trump //did not explicitly command people to use bleach on their lungs//, but he did publicly wonder if disinfectants could be injected or used internally to clean the lungs.

During a White House COVID-19 briefing on April 23, 2020, Department of Homeland Security official William Bryan gave a presentation mentioning that household disinfectants like bleach and isopropyl alcohol could kill the virus on surfaces.

(true enough, and copper on door handles was also looked at btw)

Trump then turned to medical experts in the room and mused out loud about researching internal applications.The Exact QuoteThe widely discussed remarks from the official C-SPAN transcript and subsequent fact-checks show Trump stated:

"And I see the disinfectant where it knocks it out in one minute. Is there a way we could do something like that by injection inside or almost a cleaning because you can see, it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, and I think it'd be interesting to check that."

(lung "disinfectant therapy has been around a while too, since the days of TB)

Conclusion: We recommend use of simple disinfectants like 5% Phenol or

AI Overview

The earliest form of lung disinfectant therapy using bronchial inhalers is historically known as antiseptic aerosol therapy, which emerged in the mid-to-late 19th century. This approach was driven by the onslaught of tuberculosis (the "white plague") and a lack of effective treatments.Before the advent of modern antibiotics, physicians attempted to target and destroy respiratory bacteria by having patients directly inhale vaporized, harsh chemicals.The Disinfectant Chemicals UsedInstead of treating respiratory symptoms with bronchodilators, 19th-century medical practices relied on early glass-bulb nebulizers and ceramic steam inhalers—such as Dr. Nelson's Inhaler (invented in the 1860s)—to administer severe chemical agents:

Your denial of reality is conformed.

This paper explores the historical use of alcohol in treating respiratory diseases, tracing its significance from ancient civilizations to the present. It discusses the cultural perceptions of alcohol as a medicine, its evolution through time, the societal impacts of overconsumption, and the shifting medical views on its efficacy in alleviating respiratory conditions. The paper concludes that while alcohol has been widely prescribed for various ailments, its role in modern medicine remains complex and requires careful consideration.

Key takeaways

Alcohol has a long history as a treatment for respiratory diseases, dating back to 2000 BC. The Temperance Movement significantly reduced alcohol consumption by 50% in the US during the 19th century. By the late 19th century, alcohol was commonly prescribed for conditions like pneumonia and asthma. Moderate alcohol doses were deemed to have little therapeutic value, while larger doses acted as depressants. Current medical practice rarely includes alcohol for respiratory issues, focusing instead on its social and health risks.

Can't use what the FDA plays keep-way with:

Background and DevelopmentThe Technology: Developed by scientists at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and licensed globally by Aytu BioPharma (formerly Aytu BioScience), Healight is designed as an endotracheal catheter that emits narrow-band ultraviolet-A (UV-A) light. It is inserted down the breathing tube of mechanically ventilated patients to kill viruses and bacteria inside the upper respiratory tract.Clinical Trials: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the device underwent a very small "first-in-human" safety study involving only five critically ill patients. While the company reported positive preliminary data regarding viral load reduction, the sample size was too small to prove definitive efficacy.Broader Research: Aytu has shifted its long-term focus toward investigating the light's effectiveness against other severe respiratory conditions, such as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and severe influenza. However, broad adoption in hospitals cannot happen without extensive, multi-phase human clinical trials and official regulatory clearance.

The pre-print publication titled “Endotracheal application of ultraviolet A light in critically ill severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 patients: A first-in-human study” concluded that endotracheal UVA light treatment was associated with a significant reduction of SARS-CoV-2 viral load and improvement in WHO clinical severity scores. Additionally, the endotracheal UVA light treatment did not result in any serious adverse device effects and was well tolerated.

(iow, it worked!)

Distract distract distract!

AI Overview

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. government did not explicitly pass a federal law banning or blocking the legal sale of human-grade ivermectin.

??However, the sale, prescription, and distribution of the drug were heavily restricted, discouraged, and modified across multiple channels due to a coordinated pushback by federal agencies, healthcare organizations, and retail platforms.//

The targeted actions and regulatory mechanisms used to suppress ivermectin sales for COVID-19 treatment involved several key initiatives.1. Federal Warnings and Corporate RestrictionsThe FDA Campaign: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mounted a massive public health campaign warning against using ivermectin for COVID-19. Their most viral campaign featured the slogan, "You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it."Retail Content Controls: Major retailers took direct action to curb sales driven by COVID-19 claims. As documented by The Washington Post, Amazon altered its search autocomplete features to prevent users from finding ivermectin under terms implying it cured COVID-19, and placed explicit warning notices on search results.2. Medical Board and Pharmacy RestrictionsProfessional Directives: Major medical organizations—including the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Pharmacists Association (APhA)—issued joint statements calling for an immediate end to prescribing and dispensing ivermectin for COVID-19 outside of official clinical trials.Hospital and Pharmacist Refusals: Many hospital networks explicitly banned the drug from their COVID-19 treatment protocols. Many pharmacists exercised their right of refusal, declining to fill valid human prescriptions if they suspected it was being used off-label for coronavirus.3. Animal Supply ConstraintsBecause human-grade ivermectin requires a prescription, a surge of people attempted to buy highly concentrated veterinary ivermectin (paste and liquid) from agricultural stores.Behind-the-Counter Moves: Farm supply stores were forced to put animal dewormers behind locked glass or remove them from shelves entirely.Proof of Ownership: Some feed stores went as far as requiring buyers to show physical proof of livestock ownership (such as a picture with their horse) before allowing a purchase.4. Subsequent Legal Walkbacks and SettlementsThe aggressive messaging used to block the drug eventually led to a major legal backlash from the medical community:The Doctors' Lawsuit: Three physicians sued the FDA, claiming the agency overstepped its boundary from "informing" the public to practicing medicine and unlawfully interfering with the doctor-patient relationship.The 2024 Settlement: As reported by POLITICO, the FDA agreed to a legal settlement in March 2024. The agency was forced to delete and permanently archive its "You are not a horse" social media posts and remove its consumer website advising against the drug.Current Stance: Despite removing the social media posts, the FDA maintains its medical stance that clinical trial data does not prove ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. Concurrently, multiple U.S. states have since passed laws explicitly protecting or allowing the over-the-counter (OTC) sale of human ivermectin.

Re-inserting snipped parts:

But, I think he knows that he is wrong, and like so many others he prefers to act like a total asshole, rather than acknowledge that he was mistaken.

QED

What a wimp!

Little Man George Wildman Ball did not hold a title as a "state director"; rather, he was a prominent American diplomat who served as the Under Secretary of State for economic and political affairs under Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson from 1961 to 1966, and later as the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations in 1968.

Given they may barely speak English, true.