Don't do what? Clear the toilet or clear the line? Today's toilets do
an excellent job of flushing the bowl. At home we have two Kolhers,
where I worked we had four more. None ever missed. Some of the
original designs were nasty but plenty of good ones now. .
+1, you are absolutely correct!
As for double flushing, unless these guys are disposing of elephant
manure down their toilets, this is ridiculous advice. People use far
more water in their houses than just the toilet. Hopefully they
shower, wash their hands, wash dishes, etc.
If for some ridiculous reason they are concerned about the toilet not
providing enough water to get the solid waste out to the sewer line or
septic tank, they need to consider the other water use on the property
and the fact that having some solid waste in the sewer lateral line is
almost unavoidable and completely normal.
Now, if they only evacuate their bowels once a month and use no other
water and if their feces has the chemical composition of mortar or
Roman concrete, then they might have an issue. However, if any of
that is the case, their sewer lateral is the last thing they should be
The first low flow toilet I installed was in the head out in the barn,
it was an inexpensive American Standard toilet and it worked better
than any other toilet on the property. I then went ahead and replaced
the other seven toilets on the property with esthetically nicer
looking American Standard units and they all work great and have, for
the past decade, since being installed.
No one should let the BS about "not using enough water", influence
their switching over.
I'm not convinced. Use enough water in
the first place, and you will conserve in
the long run. Or, install combo high-low
volume flushers, with a button for liquid
waste and one for solid.
Sam from Service Plus did. He works with this every day. Please list
Meantime, take a look at this
San Francisco's big push for low-flow toilets has turned into a
multimillion-dollar plumbing stink.
Skimping on toilet water has resulted in more sludge backing up inside
the sewer pipes, said Tyrone Jue, spokesman for the city Public
Utilities Commission. That has created a rotten-egg stench near AT&T
Park and elsewhere, especially during the dry summer months.
The city has already spent $100 million over the past five years to
upgrade its sewer system and sewage plants, in part to combat the odor
Now officials are stocking up on a $14 million, three-year supply of
highly concentrated sodium hypochlorite - better known as bleach - to
act as an odor eater and to disinfect the city's treated water before
it's dumped into the bay. It will also be used to sanitize drinking water.
That translates into 8.5 million pounds of bleach either being poured
down city drains or into the drinking water supply every year.
Oh Norman, what is your experience with these matters? The information
I gave here came from a tradesman that has been specializing in sewer
lines for 30 years. Are you saying his real life every day experience
is BS? Do you know that every house is the USA will work properly with
minimal flush water?
Clog from roots aside, they work well in my house but I relayed the
information that came from a gut that specializes in sewers. My guess
is that he has seen and experienced more than you. He sees four or five
hsoues a day. How about you? Please explain.
Ed, I will not be baited into a fight with you.
That said, let's look at this logically.
On my property, the toilet which is closest to the city sewer line in
the street is about 225 - 245 feet away. All the toilets on the
property are low-flo (that is the only kind sold in California), they
all use between 1.28 - 1.6 gallons. The lateral line to the street is
made of plastic and is sloped at approximately 1/2" per foot and the
city pipe is about 10 feet deep.
Even with 5 gallons per flush, there is no way the solid waste is
going to make it from the toilet to the city sewer without additional
water, and that is the point. The toilet's job is to evacuate the
waste into the waste line and then to the lateral.
The waste makes its way out to the street by the virtue of the other
water which is used on the property; showers, baths, dish washing,
hand washing, shaving, etc.
As I stated previously, I have about 8 low-flo toilets on the property
and they have been installed for at least ten years. I have never had
a clog in the main line since I removed the cast iron, which had been
damaged by roots, replaced with plastic and installed low-flo toilets.
If people are getting clogs in their lateral line and the clog is not
due to roots, corrosion or other foreign items (toys, stuffed animals,
etc), the issue isn't being caused by low-flo toilets but rather by
improper installation of the lateral, offsets in the lateral caused by
shifting soil (also improper installation), or by lack of normal
residential water use.
Baited? Don't make an ass of yourself, I've never baited anyone into
an argument. If you think I'm baiting you just put me in your kill file.
Did I say different? The toilet is not the cause, lack of water is, no
matter the source. The problem may be caused by may other matters such
as the cast iron you had, but more water helps.
Maybe you take longer showers to make up for flushing. Your situation
is not the same as every other sewer in the country. If you'd like,
I'll give you Sam's phone number and you can tell him how your one
property experience proves his observations of thousands of sewer
situations over 30 years to be wrong.
One way or another, you need X amount of water to move the poop. I
think we both said that.
Ed, Ed, Ed, I am not sure why you are taking such a confrontational
posture. I do believe you are scrapping for a fight and no, I will
not kill file you and no, I will not satisfy your desire for a fight.
First you say lack of water is the cause, then you say the problem may
be caused by other things......
Sure, give me Sam's phone number.... ;-) Ed, seriously?
You can believe whatever you wish, but, all things being equal and
installed correctly, low-flo toilets will not be the cause of clogs in
the lateral, period. If the plumbing is damaged, contains foreign
objects, is corroded, not installed correctly, etc, then that would be
the problem, not the toilet. Yes, in a someway defective sewer
system, adding more water may compensate, but the defect is the
problem, not the low-flo toilet.
No, I implied the waste movement, in a properly designed system
requires a certain amount of water to move out to the street. In an
improperly designed or defective system with similar characteristics,
it will either clog or require much more water to do the same thing.
Either way, it is not the toilet.
I have no desire for a fight except in your twisted mind.
Yes, there can be many sewer problems and enough water takes care of
many of them. Minimal water may not overcome a defect, say a slipped
joint leaving a bump to go over.
Do you have reading comprehension problems? The lack of water in some
systems is the problem. The toilet works just fine, but having 1.2
gallons instead of the former 5 gallons is what shows up the problem.
San Francisco is having a lot of problems from the lack of sufficient
water flow because there are so many low flow toilets.
If the plumbing is damaged, contains foreign
WTF do you think I've been saying?
Wow, I don't know what to say. For Christmas I'll get you Roget's
Thesaurus. Comes with an instruction manual.
Weeellllll , out here in the weeds the only thing that is plumbed
into the septic tank is the toilets- gray water is going to a leach
field . All PVC , all sloped between 1/8" and 1/4" per foot , and we
very seldom have problems . In fact we seldom flush just pee , usually
wait for solid waste unless there's a lot of TP in the bowl . Of course
the main toilet is an older one we got used ... probably around 2.5 gpf
with the water level set a little low as I have it . Just installed a
low flow unit in the new master bath , we'll see how that one goes .
In alt.home.repair, on Sun, 9 Jul 2017 13:37:21 -0700 (PDT),
For the record, even if it were to be agreed that they are a bad idea,
that doesn't make them a scam. They are meant to save water, and they do
most of the time. That there can be problems doesn't change that. No
one is being tricked or cheated, which are the requisites for a scam.
I suspect that you don't live in California and that you're not in
charge of making sure your town has adequate water to meet demand.
What I did, when I move into this cash as is (or was) house... the
sewer line was bad when I moved in. I dug up about 15 feet of it, easy
digging it was only a couple of feet deep, it was the clay stuff, 2
foot joints and it had dropped where there was probably an old cistern
and there were root masses at the joints. I pulled out the 15 feet...
yeah, must have been either 14 or 16 feet of it (two foot joints) ...
and got some three inch PVC sewer line... cut the end of one to an angle
and marked the other end so I'd know which way to keep the bevel down
and shoved it into the old line, then another joint marked again... then
another and another till it finally hit the sudden drop out at the alley
then the other way to the house and hooked it up there, back filled
around it with sand till it covered the pipe. I could hear it crunch
through the root masses at each joint. That was 30 years ago and it's
still working. Really, all you have to know is shit runs down hill,
the boss is a SOB, and payday is Friday at 5.
Now about human excrement and crappers... all turds are not created
equally, I suggest a high fiber diet making soft stools and a old
fashioned big tank toilet.
Basically what I've picked up from this thread
is that even if low-volume toilets have
improved to the point where double-flushing
is rarely needed, there are long-term
consequences where sewers are concerned.
That alone is enough reason for me to
want to go back to a good ol fashioned
three-gallon Johnny, or at least try those
new lo-hi dual mode flushers.
Wayne Boatwright wrote: "Where can you still buy one of the old fashioned three gallon toilets?
I thought they were illegal, but I suppose you could find one at a retro "
I suppose. And the only reason they're 'illegal'
is because in the long-term, people: LONG-TERM,
they actually save water and keep things flowing
below ground, either into the sewer or a septic
I believe that strictly low-flush toilets were mandated
to INCREASE water consumption, via double-flushing,
and to make money for both their manufacturers and
for the water utilities. Same reason the energy
utilities love 'Daylight Saving' Time.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.