How scary is a democratic socialist candidate? Apparently not as scary as a MAGA one

Jul 24, 2026 Last reply: 6 hours ago 4 Replies

A S*it Eater Trump Endorsement or MAGA Spells Doom For Midterm Slaughter Candidates



How scary is a democratic socialist candidate? Apparently not as scary as a MAGA one


The rise of democratic socialists in recent House primaries is certainly posing problems for the Democratic Party.



But as Republicans seek to make this a central issue in the 2026 midterm elections, new data indicates it might not be as big a liability for Democrats as one might think.



A case in point: A new poll suggests that a democratic socialist candidate is actually less of a liability than being a MAGA supporter or being endorsed by President Donald Trump.



The new CNBC poll got at this question in an interesting way. It asked registered voters whether they would be more or less likely to vote for candidates with various associations.



While 50% of voters said they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who describes themselves as a democratic socialist, just 32% said they would be more likely. That’s not too good.



Then we get to the “but.”



The numbers were slightly worse for a generic candidate endorsed by Trump. Registered voters said they were less likely to support that candidate,



52%-29%.

And the numbers were significantly worse for a candidate who described themselves as a supporter of the MAGA movement. In that case, the margin was 57%-27%.



Perhaps even more important than those overall numbers, the Trump-endorsed and MAGA options also engendered more passionate opposition than a democratic socialist did. (That doesn’t bode well for the GOP’s strategy since the idea is generally to scare would-be voters away from democratic socialist candidates.) So, while 42% said they were “much less likely” to back a democratic socialist, that number was 46% for a Trump-endorsed candidate and 50% for a MAGA candidate.



The poll also suggested registered voters might becoming more okay with at least a little bit of socialism. Streaming now CNN's John King talks to a group of six voters during a virtual panel discussion.



Democrats on the future of their party



While 44% of voters said “some form of socialism” would be bad for the country, 51% of Americans said so in a 2019 Gallup survey.



And another 40% of registered voters said some form of socialism was a “good thing.” (The US government already has forms of socialism like social safety net programs. And Trump has pursued some socialistic policies like having the federal government take ownership stakes in various businesses.)



Somewhat similarly, the Pew Research Center in a recently released survey found a declining percentage of Americans said they disliked political leaders who identified as democratic socialists.



The poll, which was conducted in January, showed 38% said they disliked such leaders. That was down from the mid-40s in 2021 and 2022. And the percentage who said they disliked such leaders “a lot” was 28% — down from



34% earlier this decade.

To the extent the percentage of respondents who strongly object to democratic socialists is between 28% (from the Pew poll) and 42% (from the CNBC poll), that might help Republicans motivate some GOP base voters who feel strongly about the subject. And that’s politically valuable, especially in a midterm year in which Democratic voters appear significantly more enthusiastic than Republican ones. One of the most valuable things in politics is an effective boogeyman.



But democratic socialism doesn’t seem to be an issue that alienates even close to half the electorate. In other words, it doesn’t seem likely to sway swing voters as much as it did before.



So Republicans might want to start worrying that MAGA appears to be an even bigger boogeyman than the big boogeyman they were counting on.


More TDS. What will you do after Jan 20, 2029?

--

Every person in the US is here either legally or illegally. Those that are here illegally should be afraid. Be very afraid. It does not matter how long you have been here. It does not matter why you are here. It does not matter what you have done legally while you were here. It does not matter what any relative may have done while you were here. It only matters that you are here illegally. It may take a day, a week, a year, or longer but we will find you and we will deport you. Be prepared.

Deport them all.

Due process: Q. Are you here legally? If so, where is the documentation to establish that?

I support ending birthright citizenship

All politicians are trained to lie and make those lies sound like the truth. They start with the biggest lie of all: Politicians are public servants.

Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I support:

A Constitional Amendment establishing the Freedom of Choice.

The elimination of public expression, display or support of religion or religious positions.

AA 966

Perhaps by then Usenet will ban people who post the same thing several times. What a day!

Attila snipped-for-privacy@here.now wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

Karoline Leavitt said, "It's hard for President Trump to make key decisions on Iran when he doesn't have enough intelligence."

That's okay. Karoline has a good, even if corrupt, head on her shoulders. I'd rather she was making the decisions than President Trump anyways.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required