I still don't see the conflict. It is simply an exception to an exception. Convoluted, perhaps but since 210.23 is referenced in the
210.11 exception the 210.11 exception prevails.
I still don't see the conflict. It is simply an exception to an exception. Convoluted, perhaps but since 210.23 is referenced in the
210.11 exception the 210.11 exception prevails.Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required