> > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:49:46 -0700,
snipped-for-privacy@netscapeSPAM-ME-NOT.net
> > (paghat) wrote:
> >
> > Lilly, I feel there may be hope for you. Although Paggers thinks I was
> > mean-spirited because I emailed her asking that she not support *the
> > would-be author who shall not be named* -- I think that you, at least,
> > might recognize that NONE of this is relevant to either
rec.gardens.roses or
> rec.ponds.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > the adults
>
> YOU among "the adults"? Get real. You're so crazy-ass that you
ABUSED
usenet by your unwarranted & assinine attempt to convince usenet
> posters to go to amazon.com & post bad reviews of someone's book.
> Whether or not it was bad was beside the point. You saw an open
forum,
you personally abused it, & like any skanky second-rate troll you
> invited others to abuse the same review forum. It's the kind of
> behavior that could very easily have gotten you successfully
netcopped
if anyone thought you were worth the extra penny of their time to
> treat you as your treat others. That you invited abuse of the amazon
> review system as your personal revenge tactic -- against someone who
> never actually did you any harm -- is behavior that makes you an
> abusive asshole at best, a crazy net-stalker at worst.
>
> Then in response to the poor sap's perfectly REASONABLE post on
> aconites, which by the way are perfectly appropriate around ponds or
> in the shade of large old roses, you e-mailed ME and told me what a
> spammer the original poster is & for me to banish him & never reply to
> him & so & so forth -- inducing me to tell you to "keep it on
usenet"
& stay the hell out of my personal e-mail. Your off-net tactics to
> drum up "support" for you irrational obsession extends what appears
> indeed to be net-stalking off & on the web, whether the sap spams or
> not. If you can't even wait for an ACTUAL spam upon which to start
> harrassing & acting crazy, there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with you > babe.
>
> So don't drag my name in your nastiness unless you seriously do want
> an outsider's CLEAR evaluation. The original poster wrote of a
flower
I love, a good & appropriate post. I responded with valuable
> additions. And you right away restart your harrassment game BECAUSE > YOU'RE CRAZY. >
> If and when you learn to be a rational "adult" as you pretend,
that's
the same day you'll master your killfile or merely use your delete key
> when you take one of your irrational dislikes to someone, rather than
> email strangers & try to drum up support for your stalking methods. As
> it stands, anything the alleged spammer has ever done wrong in the
> past is NOTHING compared to YOUR bad behavior right here & now, up to
> & including starting your own crossposted flame threads on a topic you
> pretend you wish was gone.
>
> -paghat the ratgirl