eal with a friend who has an (ill-founded IMHO) prejudice against microwave cooking.
xperience I am bound to respect, even if I don't agree with his thinking pr ocess. (He was brought up in a rural setting in the Veneto where micros wer e unknown; he strongly prefers eating fresh food only; does not like to reh eat, et.
ove cooking in water works by heating the same molecules from the outside i n.
micro doesn't lose them.)
ect his thinking process is, uh, unscientific, but it's his taste buds... ( and possibly his confirmation bias..?)
hefs not use micros? My first reaction was because of the large quantities that would overwhelm kitchen resources. But any inherent reason?
AN FUNCTION AGAIN!
Thanks to all for comments. Like most threads, this one swerved into vario us paths, often projections by posters about what I know, what I like/eat, how MWs function, and the usual few gratuitous snarkisms, suggesting I'm de tached from reality.
As a gentle reminder, I was not seeking info on use/science of MWs which I have studied. I was bouncing an outside professional opinion off the NG re: *taste* of food prepared in MW. The "outside opinion" source may be emoti onal rather than scientific; I don't propose to put him on trial.
I must have a rather dull palate, because MW cooking doesn't offend me tast e-wise. Well,even *I* can tell a baked in the oven potato from one basical ly steamed in the MW, but if I'm a hurry, which I often am, I just go with the MW.
Pax vobiscum.
HB