Re: SC

Jun 24, 2005 21 Replies

Not stolen. Forced to sell. Stealing means they came in and forced me off the land without compensation. Forced to sell means they've given me what they deem fair price for my property, and then told me I -must- take the offer. Neither is an attractive or good thing, but the latter at least leaves me with some cash to send fliers to their other constituents, organize groups against them, or (at an extreme) fund my own candidacy against them.

I want to make them wriggle in debates when asked by their opponents point blank "why don't you value private property and the rights of Americans to home ownership?" I would want it to become not just an issue but -the- issue when they come up for re-election. And I would want them to face a crushing, resounding, defeat in the election - knowing full well why.

I would -not- want to shoot them in the face, as Don suggests and you appear to agree with. All that does is get one shot themselves, and moreover, it draws attention from the official's dangerousness and s.h.it's hatred of average Americans.

Good luck finding an opponent who does that. I'm betting your more likely opponent is "now that you've stolen his house, why didn't you use the procedes for a different project that some other faction deem 'worthy'."

None of them want you free, they just want to use you differently.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required