You want evidence that man is a self involved ignorant species? YOU are the
evidence, proved and reproved. You in your arrogance have displayed it here
for all to see.
Was that calling you a name? Too bad. Live with it.
Is that anything like you calling me a liar, my offering to categorically
prove I was telling you the truth and you backing down?
Maybe YOU might benefit from asking yourself why you attacked Robatory with
a derogatory comment while in the very same message you cried to me about
abuse? Shall I quote the message back to you? I've been saving it just for
times like this.
You're a Big Crybaby who is wholly unable to follow his own advice.
So.Go Fuck Yourself Miller!!!
And thanks. I asked myself if I should swear at you again and realized that
I'd benefit immensely from letting those few who didn't know, what kind of
Flakey Asshole you are.
Note that saying I don't believe you isn't the same as calling you a liar.
I didn't "back down" -- I rejected your choice of an arbitrator, and offered
my own choice -- which *you* rejected. So by your criterion, that means *you*
"backed down". Pot, kettle, black, and all that...
You're certainly managing to show what sort of person *you* are, at any rate.
Miller, you're a lying piece of shit. Read the following texts and tell me
they're not EXACT text quotes of your words and my replies.
Sure, you fly him up to Toronto. While ideologically, Tim is an <expletive>,
you're nothing more than a cut rate flim-flam artist. You suggesting Tim
while thinking that I'd turn him down shows that you have no intention
whatsoever to take me up on my challenge. A simple picture with me and Tim
is all it would take to validate the truth. Hell, I might even get along
with the guy if I met him in person.
Feeble attempt at changing the topic. Sarcastic response or not, you said
you offered me an alternative which I rejected. That was a FLAT OUT LIE.
I proved you're a liar TWICE. You can't be trusted with anything you have to
say. You are a PROVEN LIAR and that's something you can't refute. Criticise
me all you want Miller, I'd much rather be accused of using foul language on
occasion than being an untrustworthy liar.
You'll lie and twist the truth in your feeble attempts to sway others, but
you can't do that anymore now because all can see that you'll lie at a
moment's notice if it will help your argument.
It's quite obvious why that is:
The plain truth is that you don't have any ethics or moral integrity.
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:26:04 -0600, Dave Balderstone wrote:
What don't you understand about "peer-reviewed" and "scientific journal"?
Somehow, your references don't seem to meet that criteria. Perhaps you,
and others, might want to read:
And for a survey of scientific opinion on the matter:
However, I do realize I'm dealing here with your beliefs. Beliefs are
notoriously unwilling to change in the face of evidence, so I won't
pursue the matter further.
Intelligence is an experiment that failed - G. B. Shaw
Are you writing letters to your Congresscritters and organizing protests and
printing bumnper stickers and inventing an appropriate color for a ribbon
and all the rest that is necessary to actually get something done about it,
or are you restricting your activities to arguing on USENET?
Or do you think that raising utility rates through the roof is going to be a
Pffft. Scientific American's pronounced left-wing bias has been well known for
at least a decade. They've had at least a slight leftward tilt for as long as
I can remember, but it really went out of control about five milliseconds
after John Rennie took over as editor. They're *not* a credible source about
any scientific issue that has political aspects.
Given the fact that global average temperature has been falling since
1998 -- a fact NOT predicted by AGW models, and that the AGW alarmists
have now postponed GW doom for 50 years, perhaps the problem of belief and
orthodoxy is not on the part of those who do not subscribe to the AGW
faith. (oops, now climate change since the warming part didn't work out)
If you're going to be dumb, you better be tough
JUST YOU WAIT. IN 50 YEARS, THERE'S GOING TO BE GLOBAL WARMING LIKE YOU
But Al Gore will continue to profit selling carbon credits between his
own companies while maintaining a larger "carbon footprint" than most
people on the planet.
Peace be upon him.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.