XP Mode in W7 [OT in uk.d-i-y]

cripes when you have clock speeds of the order of 1GHZ plus compared with maybe 2Mhz back in the day...

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher
Loading thread data ...

Its does bring home the rate of change though, when you have a phone based emulator out performing a multi user mini computer...

(I still remember asking the admin of the first multiuser mini I used how much RAM it had - he proudly boasted 1024K ;-)

Reply to
John Rumm

And it does bring home the code bloat when the slower minicomputer actually produced a faster user response for many users than the modern device can, for one.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

The first (multiuser) UNIX system I used had 128k...!

Reply to
Bob Eager

Luxury. I still remember supporting about 15 MUMPS users in 128K (not a typo) on a PDP11/40. And you lost 4K of that to the I/O page.

Reply to
Huge

In message , at

15:21:36 on Tue, 22 Apr 2014, John Rumm remarked:

Assuming that's bytes, it was typical of timesharing mainframe in the mid-late 70's. Probably made out of nine thousand 1kbit DRAM chips (to include parity). The first microprocessor I programmed had 128 bytes (a single 1024k bit static memory chip arranged as 128x8).

Reply to
Roland Perry

The first one I actually got my hands on (not the cdc I used via post in primary school) had a CPU that was made from about 12 sixteen inch by twelve inch pcbs. I had to do the logic design for three of the cards and never did learn how to program it.

Reply to
dennis

Tha were lucky. When I were a lad, we had to string white dog turds onto our dead cat's leg bones and use 'em as an abacus.

Reply to
Adrian

8k! The I/O page was 4k words...
Reply to
Bob Eager

I might have meant words.

(But I didn't!)

Reply to
Huge

This is a Prime (or should that be Pr1me?) - about mid 80's vintage. They upgraded it to 2M not long after.

Reply to
John Rumm

Riches untold! The HP2100[1] which I used had only 16k (or maybe we upgraded it to 24k) 16-bit words (32 or 48 kBytes). This was magnetic core memory costing about £1000 per k words - which was a *lot* of money in the early 1970's. Far cry from today, when you can get GigoBytes for peanuts.

[1] Not sure whether it was truly multi-user but it was certainly multi-tasking - capable of doing a number of unrelated things concurrently.
Reply to
Roger Mills

To reduce this almost as far as possible....note that I never used this, although it can be run on a simulator. I dom't think my replica hardware supports it though...

formatting link

Reply to
Bob Eager

In message , at 21:40:57 on Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Roger Mills remarked:

Mainframe semiconductor memory in the late 70's was reckoned to cost £1m per megabyte.

Not long after I was selling what we'd still recognise today as a 'hard drive', albeit with an 8-inch rather than 3.5-inch footprint, cost was about £3k for 30MB. In today's money around £10k.

Reply to
Roland Perry

I never worked with the PDP8. I did, however, work with just about every model of PDP-11, running RT11, RSX11S, RSX11M and RSTS-E, mostly the latter 2. Interested to see that RSTS is supposedly a descendant of TSS-8.

Reply to
Huge

Yes, I never knew that before. I did work with RSTS a bit...we used to use it for teaching Humanities students before we moved them on to SCAN on the mainframe (SCAN was a text scanner and statistics gatherer, which I am about to re-implement on the PC for the 50th anniversary celebrations).

I always wanted to play woth a PDP-8, but at least I now have two replicas that work.

Reply to
Bob Eager

We had a 128k upgrade to our ICL 4130 as semiconductor memory. It cost a lot less than that...but it was home-brewed!

Reply to
Bob Eager

In message , Roland Perry writes

Chips!! You mean ferrite cores shirley.

Reply to
bert

No: SRAM came in, in the mid 70s IIRC

the first TTL RAM I can find was 1969: a 64 BIT chip.

If transistors/core made the first mainframes possible(1960s) TTL made the first minicomputers.(1970s)

And then MOS made microprocessors possible,(1980s+)

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

In message , bm writes

Never drove one but ISTR my first driving licence entitled me to do it along with track laying vehicles.

Reply to
Tim Lamb

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.