cripes when you have clock speeds of the order of 1GHZ plus compared with maybe 2Mhz back in the day...
cripes when you have clock speeds of the order of 1GHZ plus compared with maybe 2Mhz back in the day...
Its does bring home the rate of change though, when you have a phone based emulator out performing a multi user mini computer...
(I still remember asking the admin of the first multiuser mini I used how much RAM it had - he proudly boasted 1024K ;-)
And it does bring home the code bloat when the slower minicomputer actually produced a faster user response for many users than the modern device can, for one.
The first (multiuser) UNIX system I used had 128k...!
Luxury. I still remember supporting about 15 MUMPS users in 128K (not a typo) on a PDP11/40. And you lost 4K of that to the I/O page.
In message , at
15:21:36 on Tue, 22 Apr 2014, John Rumm remarked:Assuming that's bytes, it was typical of timesharing mainframe in the mid-late 70's. Probably made out of nine thousand 1kbit DRAM chips (to include parity). The first microprocessor I programmed had 128 bytes (a single 1024k bit static memory chip arranged as 128x8).
The first one I actually got my hands on (not the cdc I used via post in primary school) had a CPU that was made from about 12 sixteen inch by twelve inch pcbs. I had to do the logic design for three of the cards and never did learn how to program it.
Tha were lucky. When I were a lad, we had to string white dog turds onto our dead cat's leg bones and use 'em as an abacus.
8k! The I/O page was 4k words...
I might have meant words.
(But I didn't!)
This is a Prime (or should that be Pr1me?) - about mid 80's vintage. They upgraded it to 2M not long after.
Riches untold! The HP2100[1] which I used had only 16k (or maybe we upgraded it to 24k) 16-bit words (32 or 48 kBytes). This was magnetic core memory costing about £1000 per k words - which was a *lot* of money in the early 1970's. Far cry from today, when you can get GigoBytes for peanuts.
[1] Not sure whether it was truly multi-user but it was certainly multi-tasking - capable of doing a number of unrelated things concurrently.
To reduce this almost as far as possible....note that I never used this, although it can be run on a simulator. I dom't think my replica hardware supports it though...
In message , at 21:40:57 on Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Roger Mills remarked:
Mainframe semiconductor memory in the late 70's was reckoned to cost £1m per megabyte.
Not long after I was selling what we'd still recognise today as a 'hard drive', albeit with an 8-inch rather than 3.5-inch footprint, cost was about £3k for 30MB. In today's money around £10k.
I never worked with the PDP8. I did, however, work with just about every model of PDP-11, running RT11, RSX11S, RSX11M and RSTS-E, mostly the latter 2. Interested to see that RSTS is supposedly a descendant of TSS-8.
Yes, I never knew that before. I did work with RSTS a bit...we used to use it for teaching Humanities students before we moved them on to SCAN on the mainframe (SCAN was a text scanner and statistics gatherer, which I am about to re-implement on the PC for the 50th anniversary celebrations).
I always wanted to play woth a PDP-8, but at least I now have two replicas that work.
We had a 128k upgrade to our ICL 4130 as semiconductor memory. It cost a lot less than that...but it was home-brewed!
In message , Roland Perry writes
Chips!! You mean ferrite cores shirley.
No: SRAM came in, in the mid 70s IIRC
the first TTL RAM I can find was 1969: a 64 BIT chip.
If transistors/core made the first mainframes possible(1960s) TTL made the first minicomputers.(1970s)
And then MOS made microprocessors possible,(1980s+)
In message , bm writes
Never drove one but ISTR my first driving licence entitled me to do it along with track laying vehicles.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.