Super heavy snow?

Flashing doesn't go that deep, an inch at the very most, so about 25%. B-)

Reply to
Dave Liquorice
Loading thread data ...

Akh! That's annoying. I'm a former board member and reserve performance auditor. I'm going to have some questions to ask at the next meeting.

JGH

Reply to
jgharston

The carport did not fail. The fixings did not fail. It fell down because there was insufficient weight of masonry above it to form a counterweight. It was installed in an unsuitable location.

I can see why it might be attractive not to have supports as you can hit them in the dark whilst parking.

Reply to
harry

So they don't deteriorate with the sun.

Reply to
harry

You are a half wit. Traditional houses are load bearing by reason of the purlins.

Only in houses with trussed roofs are they not. Even then the gable is supposed to be tied to the roof structure.

Reply to
harry

Masonry walls stand by gravity so it makes little difference. In any event the raking/cut would only be around 30mm.

Reply to
harry

Plenty of companies eager to sell them, just Google cantilever carport:

formatting link
We use hilti fixings for supporting our cantilever carport beams. These not only support the carport but are also capable of coping with high winds and heavy snowfalls.

formatting link
The canopy has been tested at the University of Lancashire in Preston, to a snow loading of 1690kg. And to a wind load of 146mph, far in excess of whatever is likely to occur.

Chris

Reply to
Chris J Dixon

Actually it makes quite a significant difference. Pulling a brick out with mortar on all sides is far harder than pulling out one that has a section of mortar above it removed and replaced with something that is ductile and self lubricating.

Reply to
John Rumm

Hello pot, meet kettle.

Which bit of the phrase "trussed rafters" above did you not understand?

Also note that traditional purlin layouts leave a diamond section at the top of a gable unloaded.

It may have a few straps, but it does not add significant structural strength. The tops of gable walls can be quite weak when subjected to lateral loads.

Reply to
John Rumm

And another one, in Corby, Northants.

formatting link

Reply to
Owain

formatting link
That sort of design always strikes me as weak. For not much extra cost, you could put in some uprights tied into the wall top and bottom, and use these to take the torque, reducing the lateral loading on the wall at the top.

Of course, if the wall were reinforced concrete, you'd just need to tie the fixings into the reinforcement.

Reply to
John Williamson

that much snow on either of them (judging by nearby roofs) wonder if the cowboys will stop fitting them to single storey gable ends?

Reply to
Andy Burns

I had a shufi at some fitting insturctions on line which seem to call for either 900mm of brickwork above the port or the addition of vertical braces (as visible in that Google maps link). It looks like manufactures should be seriously rethinking their fitting advice.

I wonder who'll pay up? Home-owners insurance, the car port fitters or the manufacturers?

Tim

Reply to
Tim+

En el artículo , Owain escribió:

to report it real soon now.

Reply to
Mike Tomlinson

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D\

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D/

The bricks have not pulled out. The whole wall has tipped over. It was not heavy enough to counter the weight of snow. If it had been a two storey building there would have been no problem.

Reply to
harry

Don't forget to report back.

Reply to
ARW

How can you tell, given the state of what was left?

As it would if you pull a course of bricks out as well.

Reply to
John Rumm

Yes, two dishes and a carport ... ears must be burning ...

Reply to
Andy Burns

Why do you think I specifically said trussed rafters you idiot.

Reply to
dennis

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D\

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0|

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D/

Looking at the one in Corby before the collapse, the end of the canopy clos= est to the road has virtually no bricks above the support.

Reply to
fred

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.