Smokers stink but so long as they are not still breathing out smoke there is no realistic risk.
Smokers stink but so long as they are not still breathing out smoke there is no realistic risk.
It's fairly obvious the bloke wasn't aware he was breaking this particularly stupid and ill thought out law.
I am not always a customers. If I pay for a service I am a client.
Adam
Always nice to know we have rights. The government can give the people those without it costing them anything
Not necessarily. If you don't employ anyone you can do what like when working from home - if you do employ someone they may consent to your smoking.
This particular area has caused much debate in my industry, specifically the legality of people smoking at private events ( parties, weddings etc. ) held within the grounds of their own home. Staff will be employed ( waiters, bartenders, musicians etc. ) and the law states that if you're employed to work in a smoker's house you have no right to request that they not smoke in your presence. You do, however, have a right to refuse to work there.
Regards,
So cigarettes are just a tax-raising scam by the guvmint?
That'll be why they've recently banned smoking in so many places then. The passive smokers were gettign their smoke for free, so then Gordon stopped them. That makes sense.
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember "ARWadworth" saying something like:
Aye, Madame Cyn was telling us so, just the other day.
Woo Hoo !
Derek
He does not need to stop smoking he needs to move further inland.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.