of lenses. The current Sony 7 and Panasonic LX 100 beat the Nikon on many counts.
asonic LX 100 on some things although you don't give a scale that you're me asuring against so it's pretty meaningless.
Now you're just being childish. My meaning is perfectly obvious. No doubt y ou'd like me to list them so you could cherry pick your way through them re futing the ones that suited. I have neither the time or the inclination for such a meaningless task
x 3 1/4 negatives ) Rolleifles and Rolleicord, Yashicamat 124G. Mamiya C330 all mostly used as a professional in wedding and portraiture. Had my own d arkroom. Developed all films and made countless prints.
nk I could claim a modest amount of experience in camera usage.
us out of hand dismissal of mirrorless cameras as being not fit for profess ional use.
ofessional will chose one depends on what he's intending to photograph or t he market.
Now you're repeating what I have previously said.
e was a Minolta about 14 years or so ago, has see rapid improvements. The t echnology is now maturing. Modern evfs are exceptionally good. The lenses a re the same as those used by the dslra, via adapters if necessary. The sens ors are the same if not better than the dslr ones. assuming Sony keep the best for themselves. Someone above claimed that 4k video was the equivalent to 200ASA which nonsensical statement might indicate the quality of some p eople in this discussion.
any way, especailly without mentioning whether it was 35mm or 70mm.
This is the statement made:
" Its 4k resolution, about as good as 200 ASA film was. "
There is no sensible relationship to be made betweem 4k video and film spee d
ered an excellent alternative to a standard dslr and that it has/is replaci ng the dslr in many markets.
More non sequiturs,
to do with competition with phone cameras.
No It has nothing to do with it. You go one to claim you have a Pro wanderi ng around with a 4D over his shoulder claiming that his clients would not a ccept him if he started shooting with a phone camera so how are you working out that the phone camera is replacing dslrs ?
at the moment he admits that what he's doing at the moment he coul,d do wit h a phone but tehy wouldn;t have employed him to take pictures with his pho ne.
phone can't do the things he's Nikon can.
A real pro will let his work speak for itself. If he is depending on his eq uipment to give him kudos he's a poor example of the breed.
nds a Rollei could produce excellent results for certain sports. The straig ht through viewfinder allowed on to observe the action outside the frame an d plan accordingly.
der but watching with the other eye.
Bollix you do. Perhaps with a 50mm lens but beyond that and you'd be cross eyed. Anyway this would not be easy while using the camera in landscaoe mod e unless your eyes are very far apart
which did have interchangeable lenses was really too big and clumsy for su ch work IMHO.
s use of 120 film.
yuo to use a difernt perspective other than eye level fotogrphy which is wh at most do.
More rubbish.
The TLR is not always used at waistlevel.
The amateur crouch (down on one knee) gives the same perspective as the wai st level finder.
One of the exclusive features of the mirrorless is the flip up/down/sideway s screen that many have.
35mm users claiming their larger film gave better results.rged far greater than 25mm or half frame or 110
You're repeating me again
in turn is now being replaced by mirrorless.
Can we have some evidence of this please.
Perhaps in your neck of the woods.
Remains to be seen. Nikon and Canon are both reported to be cutting back on their dslr manufacturing side. The writing is on the wall.
Who knows what the future will bring.