O T: Been Given A Laptop, But ?

Yes, but that's the whole point. Photoshop, talking to the hardware (is it still called the Hardware Abstraction Layer?), is addressing something which can perform hardware acceleration. If running under a VM, it's talking to emulated hardware, which cannot pass through any acceleration demands to the real hardware. I'm sure Photoshop can run adequately under a VM - but my point was really that it's not just games that attempt to use hardware acceleration nowadays.

Reply to
John Whitworth
Loading thread data ...

What would

Reply to
dennis

No. Sorry dear.

Reply to
John Whitworth

Oh yes it can..

And hardware acceleration is not something that is absent from VMs either.

That's merely a matter of building e.g. a windows 'VGA CARD DRIVER' that offers advanced facilities to the VM client, and making sure it talks to the underlying accelerated hardware correctly via the Linux accelerated driver shims.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Shame that linux spoil chucker keeps putting the wrong words in your posts.

Reply to
dennis

You really should try some games before you make comments like that. Very few games play better on consoles, especially the more interesting strategy games IME.

Reply to
dennis

It's not just the driver though, is it? It's what the emulated hardware can do. So yes, it will do *some* things, but it will always be a few generations behind. If, for instance, nVidia release a new card that can do a new function called wongle-wangle, then all I need to do to perform a wongle-wangle on a native OS is install the card, and perform a wongle-wangle API call.

But for the VM, a third party needs to understand what a wongle-wangle is, and translate that into exactly what the hardware thinks a wongle-wangle is. So yes, anything is possible, but in practice, the VM emulated hardware is quite some way behind even today's mediocre hardware. Whatever the VM, it has to report *something* in device manager. And that something has it's limitations.

That said, I haven't reinstalled Chief Architect since I re-built this machine. So I may stick VMWare on it, and see what happens when I install it on that.

JW

Reply to
John Whitworth

Unless you pay, don't install VMware. It's screen interface is very slow.

Use virtual box, and if you want USB support, NOT the OSL - get it straight from Sun.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Seconded - I used to run vmware then switched to virtualbox, and the speed jump for graphics-heavy stuff was quite impressive.

Reply to
Jules Richardson

Well I don't think linux can play bluray movies even in an emulator running real windows. But the linux people will just claim DVDs are good enough or that you should buy a consol to play them.

Reply to
dennis

Please yourself and rant all you like but many happy hours have been wasted here over time with M/snot products!..

Reply to
tony sayer

In article , John Whitworth scribeth thus

95 and 98 was a doggie but Win 2000 was a good one relatively..

Still I know of quite a few people who are ticking away on Linux and happy with that..

Reply to
tony sayer

Just in time - about to go get download. Cheers for that! :-)

Reply to
John Whitworth

Ooh yuk. I knew Oracle had acquired Sun, but that's the first time I've gone to

formatting link
and been moved along to
formatting link
:-(

Reply to
John Whitworth

formatting link
{146fc5dc-4d2b-4813-8f34-1cb1af47789f}&CatID={ea24c7c7-65c0-4641-b305-b62f47156254}>> Source:

Well here I am again. I would just like to thank each and everyone of you for your advice and useful tips, but alas, nothing worked because there wasn't a backup of the Vista program on a hidden drive. There was however some programs which helped a little... Can't think what they were now.

I have installed Windows XP and the machine is all singing and dancing again.

With regards to Linux and it's variations. Personally I like PCLinusOS but like with all the different distros of Linux, the sound from any of my PC;s is never the same as under Windows. As Harry used to say, "I don't know why, but there it is". (Showing my age now).

I have a PC with PCLinuxOS on it which I dabble with from time to time....

Thanks again everyone.

Kindest regards,

Jim

Reply to
the_constructor

Ubuntu can be a right pain to get the simplest things to work like... Adobe flash which is used on many sites. Getting the simplest of embedded videos to work can be impossible.

Lots of programs just don't come in a Linux variant. I ended up having to put my Dad's PC back to windows after 6 months of battling with Ubuntu 7.04 (I think it was). I completely removed even the windows recovery partition on my 7yr olds new laptop and installed Ubuntu 10.04 (Beta) which still has problems with some flash sites. Finally though to get all the programs running that wouldn't work under Wine (School stuff etc) I installed windows-XP (SP1) as a virtual machine under Ubuntu which now means he can do windows properly and safely and use Ubuntu for general web stuff. Best of both worlds and far safer. :¬))

Pete

--

formatting link
Equipment and Fitness Equipment Specialists.

Reply to
www.GymRatZ.co.uk

Er! whats difficult about going to the package manager and clicking install flashplugin-nonfree.

Thats all you need to do..

ditto VLC

Kids these days..........

Reply to
Mike

Stick to flogging gym equipment, eh?

Reply to
Huge

64 bit didn't like it.

I'm not a complete computer numpty. Having been working with them since the days of DR dos and windows 3, also setting up a Freesco box and dabbling installing various BSD's via FTP install, but for Ubuntu to be a Windows "replacement" it needs to just work without having to fart about looking for things that shouldn't require going on an Easter Egg hunt.

Reply to
www.GymRatZ.co.uk

im running 64bit Xubuntu and it likes it just fine

99.99% you seem to be.
Reply to
Mark

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.