Dad is entitled to a Council grant to have his GCH system updated upto about =A33k. The surveyor who came round said all the requisite work should easily be covered in the grant. The workman from the company who came round was very friendly on his first visit; today he came to check pipes etc etc.
By all accounts he was a right surly ***** today and rude to both my wife [who was round helping my parents] and my mum. I can live with the "I won't be moving anything when I come to do the work; make sure this ain't here, that is gone; get someone to remove this cabinet [where the combi boiler will go in the kitchen] at your own expense"
He then laughed at the idea of the grant money covering the work and said we'd [I say we in lieu of dad] would have to meet the short-fall and it would be significant. He also woldn't be taking out the old bakc-boiler or the gas fire that is its front-end. Or rather he could but it would be "private" job and he'd quote separately for it. Dad would thus be left with a non- functional gas fire in the living room and a "dead" boiler behind the chimney [to which there is access via a full-length wooden side panel].
Most worrying for me though was he insisted that my wife signed a waiver than if there was any problems with the piping etc following the install then he wasn't liable. He refused to go until this was done as it was an "integral" part of the job.
Surely this can't be correct? Wife called the surveyor back who was also concerned about these issues but the family were very coy in discussing the matter fully with her. It has been left that we shall contact her back when his quote for the work comes through. She did say there is 1 fitter on the books that is very work shy and wonders if he was the one who came round.
I was very miffed when I got home to discover all this [and still am, obviously] but clarification about "normal" working practice would help. Thanks