Kurt Ullman wrote in news:rPadndQ2r8MqFPrSnZ2dnUVZ snipped-for-privacy@earthlink.com:
Maybe I'm too gullible, but the hullabaloo about the pipeline from the environmentally concerned (that's my take) made sense to me. If that is really untrue, let's find out. For now, doing stripmining and cooking the rocks to eventually get syrupy gooey oil that apparently is quite corrosive, that is not something that should be undertaken lightly. And that OK you talk about, that was hanky panky between the pipeline company and the State Dept, for chrissake. So, it was right to put a stop to the process and reconsider things.
I had the impression that the republicans thought they could get a quick campaign issue out of it, but apparently the democrats were able to turn the tables.
The jobs issues were apparently very dependent on one's views. The calculations on the numbers of jobs varied from a few thousand to 100's of thousands. Given that how you count them and how you calculate dependent jobs is an art for devils, I don't pay that much attention to what is said. I understand that pipeline construction is rather specialized, so it is almost sure that local unemployment won't be helped much. Do I care about the specialized jobs? Perhaps not as much as I should.