# OT: A rose by any other name....

• posted on November 29, 2010, 9:08 pm

Are you trying to argue that the former contains truth and the latter needn't?
(be careful. Snit... this path is fraught with pitfalls;)
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
• posted on November 29, 2010, 9:17 pm
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post 4cf4177f\$ snipped-for-privacy@news.x-privat.org on 11/29/10 2:13 PM:
...

I am noting, Steve, that you have struggled and confused two concepts for years (since 2003):
* Proof: as in that found in a mathematical proof, an absolute concept * Proof: as in adjudication, "proof beyond a reasonable doubt"
And from this you jump to asking what I am "arguing". Nothing - I am noting a fact. You have confused the two concepts *today* with your rants. Today.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
• posted on November 29, 2010, 9:30 pm

You forgot the 'h' ;)
Poor Snit... now he's trying to argue that "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" doesn't need to contain any true statements from which a deduction can be made.
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
• posted on November 29, 2010, 9:34 pm
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post snipped-for-privacy@news.x-privat.org on 11/29/10 2:32 PM:
...

You have struggled and confused two concepts for years (since 2003):
* Proof: as in that found in a mathematical proof, an absolute concept * Proof: as in adjudication, "proof beyond a reasonable doubt"
And from this you jump to asking what I am "arguing"... and then insisting you know what I am "arguing" (once again you are telling people what they think). To the contrary, I am merely noting a fact. You have confused the two concepts *today* with your rants as you have done repeatedly since 2003.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
• posted on November 29, 2010, 9:55 pm

No, you have... and it's more than bizarre that you convinced yourself of this guilt while you admit you had no proof. Political agendas are funny like that, though...
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
• posted on November 29, 2010, 10:02 pm
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post 4cf42165\$ snipped-for-privacy@news.x-privat.org on 11/29/10 2:56 PM:
...

Ah, the ol' grade school "I'm rubber and you are glue" defense. Just brilliant... LOL! But then you immediately prove me right *again* by misrepresenting my comments in a way that proves you are confusing the two concepts. Again. And since 2003. Really, Steve, that is *pathetic*.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
• posted on November 29, 2010, 10:05 pm

OK, glad to see we agree on this.