What is it? Set 423

[Jim Wilkins]

Me, for one. Also no cable TV.

jsw

[Steve Barker]

who is not on broadband?

[Rob H.]

You're on the right track, they aren't for weaving though they are basket related.

[Christian Stüben]

Hey Mr. Imnotamused, i already have reduced them to 8 mb each.

mfg Chris

okok, you are right. Next time smaller pics.

[Kerry Montgomery]

me

[Leon]

The number you are looking for is in the 250kb range.

[DoN. Nichols]

And it appears that your end was imposing bandwidth limitations on it -- because it took me a lot longer than I expected with a T1 feed to download each.

Aside from that -- you're releasing lots of information about your camera by posting an un-edited photo. Here is some of what is in the exif data on one of those photos:

====================================================================== File Name : 2012_01_13_6694.JPG Directory : . File Size : 8 MB File Modification Date/Time : 2012:01:13 03:19:21 File Type : JPEG MIME Type : image/jpeg Make : Canon Camera Model Name : Canon EOS 5D Mark II

[ ... ]

Software : Digital Photo Professional Modify Date : 2012:01:13 09:12:00 Artist : Photographer:Christian Stueben Y Cb Cr Positioning : Centered Copyright : Copyright:Christian Stueben Exposure Time : 1/25 F Number : 6.3 ISO : 6400

[ ... ]

Shutter Speed Value : 1/25 Aperture Value : 6.4 Flash : Off Focal Length : 100.0mm Macro Mode : Normal

[ ... ]

Canon Firmware Version : Firmware Version 2.1.1

[ ... ]

Owner Name : Christian Stueben Camera Body No. : 2031303238 Canon Model ID : Unknown (0x80000218) Serial Number Format : Format 2

[ ... ]

Lens Type : EF100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Internal Serial Number : N666965

[ ... ]

Primary Platform : Microsoft Corporation ======================================================================

These, selected out of 206 total lines.

One of the lines mentioned Microsoft in there, so perhaps you did edit it, but not using a program which would remove the original exif data. It looks as though it was modified about six hours after it was taken, which implies some out-of-camera processing.

In particular, the mention of the camera and lens serial numbers might make it easier for someone to claim that you have stolen their camera -- or to find it if it happened that you had stolen the camera from someone else -- which I don't expect.

So -- the use of a program which can be told to sanitize the exif data might be a good idea. Whether your program can be told to do that, or whether you need another program for that, I don't know. I actually have to take special steps to keep the exif data in the processed image.

Enjoy, DoN.