On Mar 27, 1:28 pm, Puckdropper <puckdropper(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
You are kidding, right?
Many times I have suggested that the screaming pundits that nest here
take it to
which should be their cup of tea. That newsgroup has been around
forever, and is so radical both ways that it even scares the hell out
of the spammers.
Apparently it scares the hell out of the experts here too, as they
never seem to tire of expulsing their favorite news network's newest
opinions here, not there.
And with the *tiniest* most minuscule bit of effort, one could type in
"political forum" in the Google search bar and easily find HUNDREDS of
groups (moderated and unmoderated) that cater to their own particular
flavor or vitriol.
That's not quite the point I was trying to make. They don't want to
discuss politics with the internet at large, they want to discuss them
with the guys here, on this group. I could find no group that had split
so the people on the group could have their own private political
discussions. At least not following the pattern *.something.politics.
Never teach your apprentice everything you know.
It's just like the TV or radio, turn the channel/volume button to
whatever suits you at the time.
Simply filtered two noisy threads about a week ago (do turn the filter
off and on to just to read some snide political jewels, and maybe chime
in on occasion) and for the past three days, with the filter on, there
have been eleven nicely populated woodworking threads to read.
On Mar 28, 1:19 am, Puckdropper <puckdropper(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
I respectfully disagree. To me, they are like the loudest bullies
making noise in the first grade classroom. Everyone knows what they
are saying and doing. If they are in a quiet room (like a woodworking
newsgroup), they will really stand out when they start their hijinks.
But if you put them in a classroom or a playground of like minded
loudmouths they simply disappear in the ambient noise. Nope, this is
Here again, a less than .5 second search of "starting a newsgroup"
yielded pages of instruction. Moreover, the search didn't even tap
making a private Yahoo group or a Google group.
No sale on a lack of venue. Most of these folks aren't idiots.
ANYTIME, and I do mean anytime, 24/7 every day of the year, if they
wanted to take it private and argue amongst themselves, they could
have their group set up in minutes. They are here because they want
to be, not because they have to be.
How else could their internet friends appreciate the depth of their
huge political acumen, or their keen insight into the "real" truth
that only a few can understand without their personal help? Their
opinions are of such weight and importance they have to stand out.
Arguing amongst themselves in a 15 man group would simple devolve into
petty bickering in just a few posts and the group would lose interest
These guys need an audience.
This is a public newsgroup, so it their right to post as they wish.
Their lack of respect of the group intent and charter is their
business. They are here because they want to be.
On 3/28/2010 1:29 PM, email@example.com wrote:
Yes, you can start a newsgroup. Anybody can start one in the alt
heirarchy. Good luck getting USENET providers to carry it, and good
luck getting people to use it. Unless they are carefully targetted,
splinter groups generally get no traffic to speak of.
a few seconds and *poof* you got it.
Echoing Puck's point, he was thinking that some here may want to bandy
about their beliefs with each other, and were only lacking a venue.
Who would care then, if their was a larger audience for their views if
they were genuinely, and only interested in discourse amongst
themselves? No one would care about post counts, traffic,
advertising, click ads or anything else. They could hammer on each
other to their hearts delight. And it wouldn't cost them anything,
and they could keep it amongst themselves.
*My* point was there would be no larger stage for their considered
opinions, the showboating of their perceived smack downs, and one
oneupmanship they try to practice.
My point is that for these guys it is better to be a small fish in a
mud puddle than to be big fish in the ocean.
On 3/28/2010 2:31 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
There are many venues for "bandying about beliefs". Having one more is
not going to make the discussion move from here to there.
What makes you think that anybody participating in such a discussion
cares about the size of the audience?
They don't care about the size of fish they are or the size of the
puddle, only that someone posted a statement to which they take exception.
Political threads occur in every non-moderated newsgroup on USENET.
There's nothing that can be done about it lawfully except liberal use of
the killfile. Making another empty newsgroup will not cause the
discussion to move there.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.