Ouch!

Another reminder that business owners, and woodworkers, can't be careful enough ...

formatting link
are gonna have a field day ... and insurance companies will soon be insisting on the SawStop technology as a requirement for insuring any woodworking business with employees.

And rightfully so, since only a fool would take the chance in this day age.

Reply to
Swingman
Loading thread data ...

Or perhaps the insurance companies will insist that shops not hire fools:

"Employees at the shop told police that they had told Guitierrez earlier in the morning not to use the saw because he was not trained to use it... the victim's duties at the shop were to sweep it."

Reply to
Doug Miller

Yeah that ain't going to happen. The trend is to hire cheap and keep'em for as long as they will stay and work minimum wage and benefits.

Reply to
Leon

Replace the on/off switch with a keypad and a relay. Don't give the code to idiots.

Reply to
Robatoy

Reminds me of something I came across a while ago:

"Technology is in a race with the universe to create bigger and better idiot-proof devices.The universe is trying to create bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning."

Reply to
diggerop

Fact is, it does not matter. The company will be paying in the end, as always.

Reply to
Ed Pawlowski

I bet we never here from Jose here 'cause it would probably be kind of hard to type. :-(

I am now protected by my Nomex undies...

Gordon Shumway

One positive thing about 'Cash for Clunkers' is that it took thousands of Obama bumper stickers off the road.

Reply to
Gordon Shumway

Well, that's it. Nothing else needs to be said, as the entire issue has been boiled down to its essence. Nice shot there, Ed.

The bad employees ruin it for everyone; their fellow workers, their managers, and the owners. In the end, the only one that doesn't get to shrug their shoulders and walk off after an employee generated tragedy to go have a nice afternoon is the owner.

Robert

Reply to
nailshooter41

Do you suppose that, just possibly, that someone was covering the company's ass and blowing smoke up the cops?

In most all cases of blame, there's enough to go around.

R
Reply to
RicodJour

Gordon Shumway wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

In case anyone's interested, there's a keyboard layout designed for one hand. It's specific to which hand you plan on using, but it might be a solution for someone who can only type with one hand.

You can search for "one-handed DVORAK" and probably come up with all kinds of interesting things. It's been available in Windows for over a decade (but you have to look for it to turn it on.)

Puckdropper

Reply to
Puckdropper

I see the same kind of suggestion on technical newsgroups where some administrator wants a device to prevent employees from loading random programs on corporate computers.

What's wrong with an enforced company policy that equates prohibited activity with immediate termination?

One company asserted they were as secure as Fort Knox and they hired a security expert to test their system for vulnerabilities. Did he load all kinds of complex snooping programs on their servers to check every bit and tittle for backdoors, buffer over-runs, guessable passwords, and the like?

Nope.

He scattered pen drives with trojans in the parking lot.

Seventy percent of the pen drives were plugged in to various employee desktops where the program on the pen drives immediately called home and snitched out the workers.

Reply to
HeyBub

Human nature has always been the hackers first, and best weapon.

Reply to
Swingman

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.