Puckdropper <puckdropper(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote in
Naaah. The 3.5" floppies held 1.44 MB, so backing up 150 GB that
way would require 150GB / 1.44 MB = approximately 100,000
AOL mailed out way more than that.
At a transfer rate of 15KB/sec, about 10 megaseconds. Add a few seconds per diskette for
swapping in and out, and you're in the neighborhood of four months.
1 character per bit times 150 GB is 1.2 TB to print, which would require about a thousand
reams of paper. You're right, it would be faster -- at 20 pages/min, that would take less than
nine days to print -- but I think I'd rather store the diskettes.
Not sure I understand. A restore isn't a clean install, though it
could be done, I suppose. I'm not sure why you'd want to do this.
I've actually done restores, several times. Before I would trust the
process I did it just to see if it worked. I've lost a few drives on
my laptop and have always been able to reload. Well, with the
exception of the new computer. The backup/restore software versions
were incompatible. I lost some stuff so I now copy my data to a
second disk, as well as doing the backup to the disk. Disks are
cheap, particularly the slow external drives (all that's needed).
I keep copies on my computer (in a directory called "Installed") and
that's backed up. The problem is keeping track of the license
information. I don't do a good (enough) job of that. I generally
have to search for it all. Some companies are really good about
supplying the information when needed.
It takes me at least a week. I absolutely hate it, so keep the
backups current (and more than one level).
On 5/30/2014 12:21 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Correct, a restore simply puts what was recorded, errors and all, back
on to you computer. If we are talking restores from back ups. Before
Symantics got a hold of "GoBack" that was a great program for restoring
to an earlier point. Microsoft's version is still a crap shoot by
With GoBack in the earlier years I would restore vs. uninstall software
that I wanted to try out. This was the small free types of software
that was often buggy. And like you I quit ussing external drives some
years back, Currently I have 2 SSD drives, one for primary, the smaller
one was the primary, and a terabite HD
LOL Precicely, me too except the directory is "z installed programs" I
put the z in there so that it is at the bottom of the sort list. I also
have a "z not installed programs" folder for those programs that I have
acquired through out the years but have seen no current need to install
like a previous version of Sketchup.
The problem is keeping track of the license
Well that is the key for making a clean install of everything trouble
free. I use Roboform, a program that has been around for ages. It
takes care of passwords to web sites, is a form filler, and equally
important it has a vault/SafeNotes for things like software keys,
passwords, and registration info. I probably have the info necessary
for 40 different programs stored in Roboform. Then just copy past the
Six or seven years ago I was using Acronis and doing image back ups. I
had the option of verifying each back up. The verification process
failed every time. I'm still pretty sure I was getting a good image but
you never know with a failure result. Over the period of several days
Acronis and I finally resolved the problem. Ultimately they sent me
software to test the memory in my computer. I had plenty however the
latest memory modules, that I had added a year prior were not error
correcting. I contacted Kingston and they swapped with me with only the
difference in price. No more errors.
But having said all of that, I now believe most any little thing can
throw off an image restore so I shy away from those these days.
The MS backup is a hybrid.
It has a system image for the base system , partitions and o/s.
The rest is a file system backup with revisions, you can restore files
to any point in time (that you have a backup set for). The files
protect your files, not programs, since the registry is part of the
On 5/30/2014 7:08 PM, email@example.com wrote:
Oh but the SSD's drives are so super fast. When I first had my current
computer built it booted so fast that most of the Splash screen during
the Windows boot up was gone. I had also upgraded to Win 7 and did not
realize that there was much more to it. I was having about a 15 second
boot time.;~) Now with about 20 programs, that I know of, boot takes
about 30 seconds.
I use Quicken and the file I am working on goes back to 1992. At the
time the filed covered 18 years of data. I also password protect my
Quicken files. When I first put Quicken on the new computer I also put
the data file on the SSD. The moment that I let go of the enter key
after entering the password the register flashed up on the screen. With
the data now on the regular data HD this takes 3 seconds
Absolutely. 3.0 has been around long enough now that there's really no
sense in buying a 2.0 flash drive unless the system you're using it on
is all 2.0 and you haven't added a 3.0 card for your computer. Either
that or you're severely broke. :)
The only sad part of all of this is that less than two years ago, I
bought a 64gb flash drive for $160.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.