Jet Xacta fence pads too thick

Are you saying that even with the adjustment screws all the way in (or out depending on how you look at it ;~) ) there is no room for the pads? I'm talking about the screws on the T part of the fence used to align the fence with the blade/miter slots not the ones on top that are used to square the sides of the fence to the top of the table.

I haven't had a problem with the XActa fence pads on my cabinet saw but the the pad on my 18" Jet band saw needs to be repositioned regularly... I live with it. ;~)

John

My Jet dealer suggested using Epoxy to attach the new pads. You should be able to adjust the left and right sides to allow for a 1/16" thick pad, mine are that thickness now.

Yep, been there done that and after a number of attempts, the glue that finally worked and is still holding the pads in-place after 5 years...

Gorilla Glue

Clean the mating surfaces, put glue on one, dampen the other with water and clamp them down but only snug. Don't want to force all the adhesive out. The glue will foam out and after its dry, use a razor blade or knife to clean it up. Let it set overnight in a warm basement - not a freezing shop.

If the pads truly are to thick, sand them down a bit them adjust the T bar as per the instructions.

I would have thought Jet had this problem fixed by now.

Bob S.

Yes, it's the pads that position the fence to the slots/blade from front of saw to back of saw. It's the pads that get clamped into place when the fence is locked (lever pushed down).

The saw is ~suppose~ to be about 2 years old. It's the right tilt 3HP cabinet. The motor says 2007 I think, but the fence looks to be worn more than the rest of the saw (suggesting it might be older than the saw), but it still stays Xacta II. It probably is about a 2 year old saw.

With the screws backed all the way out, I cannot get the pads into place. The pad thickness is greater than the space between the metal (that pads attach to) and the fence rail. I can slide the pads in about 1/2 way, but if I glued then on, I could never get the fence onto the rail (which is partly why they got knocked off this time, though they never would have remained in place).

The pads are probably closer to 3/32nds thick.

Plan of attack..

- wait for reply from Jet (they responded quickly to the pad falling off problem - with a set of new pads)

- sand pads down and attach with Gorilla glue (I think I have the Elmers equivalent - hope it works)

One other thought... are you lifting the lock down handle completely up as you try to place the fence on the rail? I just looked at my Jet cabinet saw with Xacta fence and the gap opens up about 1/16" more with the cam completely off the locking bar than when the cam is laying against the locking bar while the handle is in the loose position. That sentence reads terribly! LOL

John

I assume you are talking about Gorilla Polyurethane, correct?

I'm not sure if this is helpful, but I was able to buy the metal clips you use to make your own fences. I made a nice set of wood ones, with T-slots for feather boards, etc.

Yes...

Bob S.

"John Grossbohlin" wrote in message news:HpadncCCcbkN7PzUnZ2dnUVZ snipped-for-privacy@earthlink.com...

John, I think you just nailed his problem.. The lock cam may be bent, buckled or otherwise distorted forcing the whatchmajig (T bar) closer to the rail. Wish I had access to a binary site, I would take a picture of mine so he can see how it's supposed to be. The pad thickness sounds about right - don't sand them. Something else is wrong and it can only be the locking cam assy. The thickness of the pad on that should be about the same as the other pads. The locking mechanism allows about 1/8" (+/- an RCH) space from locked to unlocked position.

Look at the piece of metal that the cam forces against the rail and that pad - that's where the problem is most likely. That's assuming that the spring arms on the T bar assy are not in their full out position and that the rail(s) are original equipment.

Bob S.

"Bob S." wrote in news:gjun7j$cdt$ snipped-for-privacy@nntp.motzarella.org:

Bob, email me at puckdropper AT yahoo DOT com and I'll post it to ABPW on your behalf.

Puckdropper

Or send to me at coloradotrout AT yahoo DOT com

My cam moves from 3.156" open to 3.096" closed -- from contact point on cam (where it meets the front of rail) to the opposite side which sits down against the back side of the rail. I'm measuring just the fence and not the rail. In other words, my cam moves 3.156-3.096 =3D .

My fluroway pads are .124" thick.

My fence rail is 3.015" wide +/- .003" or so.

However, where the pads afix on the fence, there is a difference of .

So, I have 3.156 open space less .080 =3D 3.076 less .124 (pad) =3D 2.952 which is less than the rail of 3.015.

Also, the old pad was much thinner than these new ones. It was a more rubbery pad of about .049" (worn some).

But .124 - .049 =3D .075 which makes all of this work out.

e:

Got this from Jet support...

From Technical Support.

He may have to squish the metal tabs that the pads are fastened to in order to get them to fit and function properly.

Out of curiosity, do the "tabs" on your fences lie flat to the fence? Mine are purposely bent a bit for what looks like was expected that the set screws would be extended about 1/16" or so to make them parallel to the rail.

Sorry guy's, just got around to reading these posts. I will take some pics in the morning and send them to you directly. That way you'll have something to compare with.

Bob S.

ote:

More feedback from Jet..

My reply.. Are these pads different from the originals? "Squishing" the tabs seems a bit odd.

Jet response.. They are thicker than the original pad and need extra room to fasten the pads. The originals were made from a company here in the USA that went out of business a few years back and we no longer have access to the originals.

rella.org:

hough, as some

Bob --- please email me the photos if possible.

I did manage - with some c- clamps to flatten the "tabs" a bit. Those "tabs" are a piece of metal about1/16" thick welded to angle iron of the fence that extends out to the edge where the set screws push against to adjust the fence parallel to the slots. So it's a bit of a process to try to flatten. But I did manage to get .040" flatter, so now my difference is .400-.360 =3D .040.

So total thickness of fence =3D 3.156" (open cam) - .040" (metal tab stick out) - .124" (new pad thickness) =3D 2.992", but my rail is 3.015 thick. And I probably really need 3.020 clearance, so I still need to find about .030".

I don't see any other way except to sand down the pads to .100", else my fence will never want to slide along the rail smoothly.

_MASK_i?a63jfAD$z_ snipped-for-privacy@m15g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...

John,

My cam has little travel from the handle-up to handle-loose position. From loose to lock it's about 1/16". I maybe need to state that a bit differently. From the handle perpendicular to the fence (sticking straight up) to the handle in-line with the fence (sticking straight back), there is almost no travel in the cam. All the travel comes from in-line to the down lock position. And total cam travel is 1/16".

John,

My cam has little travel from the handle-up to handle-loose position. From loose to lock it's about 1/16". I maybe need to state that a bit differently. From the handle perpendicular to the fence (sticking straight up) to the handle in-line with the fence (sticking straight back), there is almost no travel in the cam. All the travel comes from in-line to the down lock position. And total cam travel is 1/16".

Sounds like there is less of a gap over all between the cam and the lever than on mine.

Just a thought, I wonder if you can remove the cam pivot bolt, insert the pads, and then put the bolt back in and let the locking lever and cam do the "adjusting" for you.

John