What makes WiFi not work?

I am sure you do. Depends what app you have. Mine is called WiFi Analyzer. But it doesn't matter what app you use, the fact is that the total channel width available in the 2.4GHz spectrum can only support so many devices, reasonably close, to maintain full bandwidth. The effect of adjacent chatter is simply to raise the noise level in your channel reducing the bit rate/range of your own kit.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher
Loading thread data ...

That's the one I use, too. My problem is that carrier levels go up and down by 10dB while I'm just looking at the screen. That waht makes me think there's something I can see creating the problem.

Reply to
charles

Well that's just an artifact of sampling and traffic. Does the same here when wifi is being used

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Really? Plenty for iPads.

Reply to
newshound

You mean just another reason to avoid Apple?

If they're using Wifi repeaters, receive on one channel and relay on another? Probably blame the neighbours for crowing their spectrum too.

Reply to
Fredxx

formatting link

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Yes indeed. One has to realise that no matter how powerful the signal from the router, its the device that connects to it that matters. If its got a weedy signal and there is a lot of interference then its not going to work due to the handshaking being disrupted by poor performance. I find it interesting, though that the next door bods turn off the wifi when they go home,, I guess it is safer from hackers and costs less electricity, but nonetheless, it might be worth a word with them as their router might be just the other side of the wall from your vulnerable device. Brian

Reply to
Brian Gaff (Sofa

Different construction? Brick downstairs, plasterboard upstairs?

Many use 2.4GHz (either Bluetooth or a proprietary 2.4GHz thing), so quite possibly.

Theo

Reply to
Theo

charles used his keyboard to write :

That up and down is perfectly normal, even when no other access points are around.

Reply to
Harry Bloomfield, Esq.

The Natural Philosopher laid this down on his screen :

13 individual channels, but wifi is spread spectrum, transmitting over three channels, the one selected, plus the two at either side of it.
Reply to
Harry Bloomfield, Esq.

R D S used his keyboard to write :

Set up an old wifi router, connected to the first with a LAN cable as a repeater upstairs. Turn DHCP to off, on your upstairs router.

Could be, they operate on 2,4GHz as do wifi.

OK, that is a certain solution, but try adding an old router first.

Reply to
Harry Bloomfield, Esq.

Brian Gaff (Sofa) brought next idea :

If it is, then a sheet of bacofoil on the OP's side of the wall, at the back of the router will help reduce it.

Reply to
Harry Bloomfield, Esq.

It spreads a LOT farther than that. each 'channel' occupies about 6, in reality.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

They are not quite that bad - at least for single channel use.

There is overspill into adjacent channels but the main problem is that to get the throughput the makers have been bonding channels together.

formatting link

Mine is nominally 4 channels bonded but I have seen ones that bond 8 channels and that doesn't leave much room for anyone else!

Reply to
Martin Brown

I leave them at 20MHz on 2.4GHz, but use 80MHz on 5GHz

Reply to
Andy Burns

6 isn't a LOT more than the channel plus 2 each side.

Andy

Reply to
Vir Campestris

It depends on how you interpret 'two at either side'

Again without punctuation that means a further two channels (one at either side)

Not a further two channels, two at each side..

And of course modulation being what it is, the concept of fitting in a channel or channels is not as exact as the words suggest.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Remembering the impact of aluminium foil faced insulation on wifi, maybe consider lining the wall at that end with even simple supermarket foil?

Reply to
polygonum_on_google

One that hasn't been mentioned is to use a slightly better quality of Wifi dongle with a high gain antenna. Morgan have quite a god one for not very much. I don't know if the new one is as good. The older ones were excellent for pushing the envelope with WIfi range.

Reply to
Martin Brown

Did you mean the cheaper (not in stock) version of this one? -

formatting link

Reply to
wasbit

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.