Not seen those before.
(404 error) ;-(
Makes sense (like headlights in fog).
I've found built in IR LEDs are a pain when using a camera with them when filming though a window etc (reflections all over the place).
Sweet.
Ok. ;-(
Neat.
A small NVR I have displays 700L on the screen when no input is attached so I was guessing that was the maximum resolution that box could support?
Not bad under those conditions agreed.
Did you have to clean the lens very often in that application?
Cheers, T i m
Try this one
About once a week in the months from Jan to October, not difficult as although it lived about 15 inches below the surface a home made bracket attacked to a bridge over the pond allowed that to be adjusted or the camera brought to the surface. Often obscured by a pond snail deciding to hang about on it though.
In the spirit of DIY the bracket was fashioned from bits of a plastic seat that goes across a bath to support an invalid/old person . The bridge is about 3 ?above the surface and fashioned from some small RSJ?s supporting the deck made from cast Iron grids of the kind used used above heating pipes in churches and old style greenhouses. Pond plants to an extent are allowed to grow up through them so you get a walking on water effect.
GH
On 01/04/2019 12:23, rick wrote: Followed up on several of the links .... it seems wired cameras are still the way to go. I can not only use the CT100 which was intent - but also use Power over Coax (PoC) .. which I was unaware of. The wired cameras are full HD resolution and very significant range, particularly at night compared to Arlo.
Thanks for pointers
Is there any 25/30fps video of the grey car lit with the 10w LEDs but with something moving? Like a person?
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required