Two ammeters in parallel

The confusion came about because you claimed a "crude swamp cooler" didn't humidify a room.

It didn't help when you explained a system that used heat exchangers which didn't humidify the room being called. The general conclusion was that is no longer a "crude swamp cooler".

There was further confusion on your part when associating a "crude swamp cooler" with putting water on a badly insulated flat roof, cooling the roof through evaporation.

While they use the same principle, as does a standard air con, they would be called entirely different things.

One tip, unless you're going senile and forgotten the tripe and silly claims you made, admit you were wrong in claiming a "crude swamp cooler" doesn't humidify a room.

It would help greatly if you pointed to just which of your posts you have in mind or quoted your actual words.

You do realise that the thread is available for everyone to look at don't you?

So when you lie, its also obvious to everyone...

You have so far made 24 posts to that thread. First on 21/08/2020

Your third post was to imply a poster was a moron Your fourth post was to question the comprehension of a poster Your firth to call someone an idiot Your sixth to questions a posters interest in reality Your seventh was an erroneous assertion about RH and temperature drop

Your eighth post on 25/08/2020 was the first one that included your flat roof procedure. However I would contend that no reasonable person would assume the section beginning "What I do here (in heatwaves only) is far cruder" was actually a description of your "swamp cooler" since it matches no one else's understanding of what a swamp cooler is.

Your ninth was to accuse someone else of of being confused Your eleventh was to call people idiots Your twelfth was to imply people don't want to learn Your fourteenth was to accuse others of wasting people's time Your fifteenth was to accuse someone of knowing jack s*it about something Your sixteenth to claim too much stupid BS Your seventeenth to accuse someone of not being sensible and having a lack of intelligence. Your eighteenth was not even wrong Your nineteenth was accusing someone of being childish Your twentieth was to denigrate someone's logical deduction capabilities Your twenty-second post was to suggest someone was not grown up enough

Interestingly you were quick to accuse others of Ad Hominem attacks against you, and yet in this thread ~60% of your posts contained just that.

Great, another waste of time.

And I stand by my statement that when someone insists that a system that I'm familiar with an they're not does not add water vapour to a room and they insist it does over & over, yes that is moronic.

You 3 have made it abundantly clear that you did not know what I was talking about. That's fine, it's life. The rest is not worth spending time on.

NT

Had you have described what your system was from the outset, no one would have disagreed with you.

The fact that *you* used the wrong name for your "system", and then threw your toys out of the pram when people questioned how what you said you had could function in the way you said it did, was a problem entirely of your creation.

The moron's here were not those pointing out the incompatibility of your claims.

That is true, we did not have a clue what you were talking about since you did not describe it. You said you had one thing, insisted it worked in a way it could not, and then spent the next 4 days calling people names before even describing (obliquely) how your system actually worked.

Denial ain't just a river in Egypt...

I asked merely for where you "described the system first time round." If you don't think it's worth posting a time and date to prove you are right then ISTM you put a very low value on your good name.