TOT: Not for EU

Jan 16, 2025 Last reply: 1 year ago 86 Replies

I don't know, but the EU were massively scared that we would. They know its all a scam to favour German industry. And the thought that we might out compete them....

We got rid of May, We got rid of Boris. We got rid oft Sunak, And we are working to get rid of Starmer.

Tell me how we (could have) got rid of Ursula-I-wet-my-Pants?

Just wait for her to be jailed over the Pfizer naughtiness...

But yes, government by consent is the alternative to tyranny, and we didn't have that consent as an EU vassal, sorry, member state.

I'd also be interested to know who selected her, why she was the only candidate, and why, had we still been an EU member, no one in this country would have had a vote on the matter anyway.

ITYM putative *colony*.

Colony: noun. A part of the body that takes in nourishment and produces s*it.

I do know that my utterly pro EU German resident/national sister said 'we didn't want her' .

Top EU jobs are sinecures given to the 'right' people. Ursula-I-wet-my-Pants was in danger of criminal prosecution, and that was a way to protect her, I guess.

No one in the EU can be prosecuted . Or fired.

Who was 'we'? The electorate had no part in her being removed.

Who was 'we'? The electorate had no part in him being removed.

Yes, the electorate made it's choice. Reform got a significant proportion of Tory votes handing the election to Starmer. It's useful to point out that Labour under Corbyn got 500,000 more votes than Starmer managed.

Who is 'we'? I think we're going to have to wait for the next GE. It's called democracy, however much you might hate it.

Certainly not piss your pants 'we'.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required