Sound Insulation in wiki?

Sound Insulation seems to be missing from the wiki? I did a search for 'Sound' and another for 'Insulation' want some references for advising a friend to use concrete blocks not polystyrene...

formatting link

Reply to
DICEGEORGE
Loading thread data ...

Rockwool board and dense acoustic foam are pretty good options. eg

formatting link

Concrete is heavy and will transmit sound rather better than you might hope - a good quality concrete flagstone will ring when struck.

Reply to
Martin Brown

Just tell him the only thing that works is mass. Thicker glass is better than thin, etc. And sound will get through anywhere air can.

Steer him away from pictures of egg boxes on walls.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Not sure whether this article used to be more prominent?

Reply to
Andy Burns

formatting link

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

Concrete is quite good for bass frequencies.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Depends very much whether the sound issue is structure borne or air borne. Brian

Reply to
Brian Gaff

Its all about decoupling the inside from the outside. I remember going into an anechoic chamber once and was surprised to note that the whole room was in fact suspended on some kind of stretchy stuff, and you could feel it move. I suspect this was because it was in a town. Brian

Reply to
Brian Gaff

I have been in the one at Salford a long time ago.

They use every trick in the book to acoustically isolate the chamber and sharp pyramids of foam as internal sound absorbers. You stand inside on a platform made of webbing. Its an odd sensation of total silence and the brain allows you to hear your own heartbeat after a while.

I suspect the OP needs to explain if the object is to keep loud sounds inside a room (eg for band practice) or intrusive aircraft noise out.

Reply to
Martin Brown

Some of the original studios at Broadcasting House - built in the '30s - are/were suspended by rubber.

But I'd guess there are other ways these days.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

The method is the same.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

I asked a similar question a few years back.

IIRC the consensus was that a void behind a false wall (plasterboard) was as good as any.

The caveat was that if you are in a semi (we are) then you can't do much about sound transmitted via the joist party wall joist interface.

We installed stud walls a bit away from the brick walls and it does seem to have made a noticeable difference.

HTH

Dave R

Reply to
David

The internal stud walls I am reskinning were all filled with glasswool. I have taken the hint only using Rockwool which is marginally better for sound.

Reply to
Tim Lamb

Joists normally run front to back on a semi - for fire reasons.

It would do. The thicker the plasterboard, the better.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.