A thought that crossed my mind. After looking up what was used in Rayburn cookers and all I can find is a reference to a letter that asbestos was never used for loose fill.
Confusing isn't it - asbestos insulation is produced from mineral found in rock - so I guess that this would class as rock mineral.
I was assured that asbestos had never been used for loose fill by the Rayburn people - back then Rayburn was still the company, not just an Aga brand name.
AFAIK they used rockwool style stuff - when I rebuilt my old Rayburn in the late 70s I managed to get some Rocksil.
See
formatting link
has been going since 1946 in various guises.
Don't know when Rayburns were first built, but I presume rock fibre insulation is an old product.
Aha -
formatting link
states "The Rayburn was first developed as a cooker and water heater in the 1940s "
formatting link
states "Health and safety research on rock and slag wool has been ongoing for nearly 70 years. " This implies that the product was around in the 1930s in significant enough quantities to justify H&S research.
So logically rock mineral fibre can have been used as insulation since the first Rayburn was built.
I think that the real question here is whether the Makita hair-splitting tool is better than the PPPro one (with 3 year guarantee) or the Ferm equivalent.
Corded or battery.
Of course, eye protection and a mask shoudl always be worn...
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.