Wrong our field of viable 20/20 vision is about 20 degrees IIRC, look it up. You *cannot* effectively use peripheral vison to watch TV.
Thats a bit garbled. It is a fact the the taller the picture the less people you can seat per unit area, a 10 year old child could work that out. ( You may find tha maths a bit taxing presumably)
And most are not even WS, I seem so many complaints about it from pretentious 'purists'
The fashion of economics and profit, not good picture making.
They have been posted in the past, you ignored them.
28" @ £280 is not smaller and not cheaper. You want small, go smaller. You want cheap then go cheaper - you can get WSTVs for under £200 these days.
It will be very good for the television industry - this promotion of widescreen you do for them. Because if Half-Brain says it is bad then it must be a "must have" for normal people.
For everyone.
That is broadcasting for you. Apply to set up your own station and then you can dish out your own programming. See if you can find a few mugs that think 4:3 is better than 16:9.
Yes, where YOU live.
No, the switch off of analogue broadcasts started several years ago when Sky and the Cable companies started to move to Digital. Sky completed its move two years ago, most cable companies have also switched off analogue or plan to do so very soon. Normal terrestrial TV will start in the next three or four years - first with relay transmitters but then the main ones. 6 or 7 years from now there will be not analogue broadcasts in the UK.
Many are already cured, others are just around the corner - what to stop that development as well?
Holy crap guys, can we stop feeding the troll already? *one* person stirring up *many* other people, *nobody* agreeing with him, if that doesn't define a troll then what does? Let's kill it already, it was interesting for a while, now it's just lame.
I have a 625 line "old fashioned" tv, and when watching stuff in W/S (which I prefer for movies), there must be a whole lot of lines which are "black" - but I have never seen figures as to what the number of lines on a W/S TV actually is.
I believe there are 625 but it is hard to get any real info, there doesn't seem to be any available. the mugs who buy WS TV's would buy anything. I also see some references to 480 lines but these may be from USA or other countries sites. The only thing which is clear is that the whole thing is a mess. Black bars all over the place - yuck.
4:3 is best, you can pan and scan a WS movie with excellent results. You cannot however pan and scan a 4:3 picture with a WS apperture. I have no doubt that the slitty eyed Japs are behind it all (Sony).
When the switch to digital TV takes place I will stop watching TV and use the license money to pay for a fast broadband connection. It seems like the only solution to this fiasco. TV will be so f*cked up by then it wont be worth watching. They can shove their WS TV's up their arses (it should be a good fit). I have no intension of becoming a WS TV victim. Its not WideScreen its WankerScreen. WSTV = WankerScreen.TechnoVictim.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.