Re: Re: Someone paid £8,893 for a solar water preheat system !

Feb 22, 2010 10 Replies

In message , David WE Roberts writes




>Don't all laugh at once but on DIYnot, poster 'Frayon' (20/2/2010 4:19
>PM) has paid £8,893
>for a solar water system that only supplies his combi with water
>preheated to 24 degrees centigrade.
>His gripe is that the system doesn't do what the salesman claimed and
>not that he has paid
>an amount that has a payback time longer than it will take to pay off
>Crash Gordons 'No more
>boom and bust'.
>
>
>Hah!
>Did you see CountryFile today?
>Some woman boasting she had paid about £60k

I think it was £16k, still ...


for a PV array on her roof which was producing enough power (90W) to
>run a few lights and her PC. Probably better in summer though.
>This was 'an investment in the future so a pensioner could live in a >good sized house'.
>Full marks for all the insulation and the centrally placed solid fuel
>heater which kept the place warm, but there was the distinct impression
>that £60K was not a major sum to her.
>
>CountryFile went on to point out that domestic wind and PV power was
>not currently economic even with the increased subsidy for exporting to >the grid.

Could save £26 / year or something ...



>They had some interesting large scale generation projects though (good
>if you happen to own a river or two).
>
>Cheers
>
>Dave R

I heard it as £60, it was a pretty large array (6x6?)

Which rather contradicted the suggestion that it had just powered her kettle.

Did I hear that the Tories have made a vote-catching promise that they would make the new feed-in tariff available to all existing installations?

Chris

what energy policy would you like there to be?

tim

I have it on a HDD still I'll replay it

ISTM that any party with this policy is onto a net vote loser, even if it gains yours

tim

Until the lights start going out.

Burning illegal immigrants in a chain grate boiler, carbon neutral but the emissions may be toxic.

What makes you think they will show us how they build them? It'll be a turnkey operation and there will be no technology transfer, that is the way these things are always done by Johnny Foreigner.

OK then, how about the Woodhead tunnel?

Chris

It's full of steam engines in a secret siding, so no space for any electric cables and any that appear to go through are just dummies so that they can put up big fences and security systems to make sure no one gets in to look.

Total bollocks, the only need for space around them is for cooling. I posted about this hours ago but the post appears to have disappeared in the ether.

Bury them in sandy soil that dries out in summer and you can blackout a good proportion of a city like Auckland - 1998 CBD cable on google finds lots of hits.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required