If the liner was so bad it needed to be replaced then a new liner should
have been used.
More plausibly, it sounds as if they tried to fit a fire that won't [or
won't easily] work with a lined flue, decided that removing the liner
was the easiest way forward and the old chimney is dropping crap on the
Check all the info about the fire and registration of the installers.
Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter.
The FAQ for uk.diy is at www.diyfaq.org.uk
The fireplace originally had a gas fire installed, with a back boiler. This
was removed (obviously) and the gas pipe capped.
The lining was a corrugated metal tube, between 6-8 inches in diameter.
The fitters yanked the lining out, then swept the chimney prior to
installation of the new fire.
The existing metal chimney pot was pushed off the top of the chimney by
using the sweeping brush!
I was told this was because it did not meet the standard required by the new
fire, and I would need a new ceramic pot, but this was not installed.
Could a pot solve my problem? I don't get rain falling into the fireplace,
and I don't notice the 'fallout' is any worse when it rains.
Could the rain be slowly dissolving the soot, and it falls when it detaches
itself from the chimney sides?
I would be concerned on why the liner was removed.
It was obviously installed for a reason (normally because the inside
of the chimney has decayed)and I can't see why it was removed when
another gas fire was fitted. Replaced maybe but not removed.
Sweeping the chinmey would remove excess soot and help in the short
term, but I would get the installation and chimney checked and
confirmed that removal of the liner will not have an detrimental
effects in the future.
Incidentally, a pot is only used to get the suction for the flue, not
keep rain out. Soot tends to fall as it dries, not by rain. However,
moisture getting into the chimney reacts with flue gases to form the
mild acid that rots the brickwork mortar joints. Thats why liners tend
to be fitted
On 13 Aug 2003 08:31:50 -0700, dg wrote:
<fing top posters, first against the wall come the revolution>
<Re-ordered to make sense>
Judgeing from the below I expect the OP still has marks in his front
lawn from the horses hooves.
So as they removed (for want of a better description) the old gas
terminal, why haven't they fitted the ceramic pot to replace it. The
flanching will need looking at if nothing else, without attention you
could end up with damp problems.
Back boiler, *lots* of fumes that will permiate the brickwork and into
Quite. I don't think a simple radiant gas fire needs a liner as such
because they don't produce anything like the amount of fumes a boiler
does. A flame effect gas fire might be different (highly ineffcient
combustion) but we don't know what the OP has. One of the resident
corgis will no doubt comment.
Dave. pam is missing e-mail
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.