Part P gains support in Parliament

"Labelling on electrical equipment sold by DIY stores must be used to warn that it is illegal for an unregistered person to carry out most electrical works in the home, says the Communities and Local Government Committee. " ... "Likewise, more must be done to alert households to the dangers of using sub-standard electricians and of the need to complete regular maintenance checks on electrical circuits in the home."

"In its current consultation exercise into Building Regulations, the Government has examined further deregulation of Part P, which focuses on electrical installation and repair.The Committee highlights how evidence gathered since the introduction of these rules demonstrated that deaths and injuries due to electrical faults have decreased.

"We could only support de-regulation if there was clear evidence that safety standards would not suffer, but such evidence has not been provided by the Government,"

Spit. Comments like the last make it much more difficult politically for any Minister to relax any regulation.

Reply to
Robin
Loading thread data ...

But were the number of deaths and injuries already decreasing before the legislation?

And thanks for the post.

Cheers

Reply to
ARWadsworth

Wrong on both counts.

Like for like needs no certification, or Council Involvement. It does need to meet H+S requirements, which generally means complying with the Wiring Regultions (BS 7671), which any electrical work has always had to comply with.

It is not a EU directive, it is compliance with UK Building Regs (Eng

+Wales).
Reply to
A.Lee

Yes, for at least 30 years (as far back as I looked at the time).

They increased quite markedly when the legislation first came in (that was in a parlementary answer), but you would need to graph them to see if that change was significant over the normal variance.

It is very difficult to get good figures to use though.

Reply to
Andrew Gabriel

There were very few (2) deaths in the year before the legislation was introduced from causes which would be removed by Part P.

Reply to
hugh

Nope.

(ICBA to reformat your posting to usenet norms, so that's all you're going to get. Sorry.)

Reply to
Huge

More people die falling from heights.

IMHO the government would be better spent making laws requiring people to remove gravity when working at heights.

You know it makes sense. Or am I mad?

Reply to
ARWadsworth

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.