Actually it didn't then and it doesn't now. Just because "he would say that wouldn't he", doesn't mean that "he" has actually done any of what "he" is presumably denying now. It proves nothing at all.
Yes indeed. Well done Tim it "proves" nothing at all. Nice to see you putting all your scientific training to good use there.
However, what possibly 99.% of the rest of the population (trained scientists excepted natch) would take Miss Rice Davies to be implying there, is that anyone in Lords Astor's position, with a reputation in society to maintain , in the absence of any other evidence to the contrary, when asked if he knew Miss Davis, a nightclub hostess and showgirl, would even if he in fact did know her, most likely lie.
As would many people in similar circumstances. Feynmann obviously wouldn't, as he didn't care, but then he was an exception.
The frisson arose from the fact that it was evident, that given her familiarity with Astor's circle, Miss Rice-Davies, if asked the right questions in Court could land a lot of them in the shit. Only it obviously wasn't in anyone's interests to ask her those questions. Just as it wasn't in her interests to land anyone in it unless forced to do so under oath; at least if she knew what was good for her.
Basically most people realised at the time that she had no reason to lie. Whereas Astor most certainly did.
But as you say Tim, it didn't prove anything at all.
Oh and BTW Astor's barrister James Burge, to whom she was responding, was the original model for Rumpole.
The truth of her allegation was never firmly established. The court case ended in August 1963 with Ward's suicide, before a verdict could be reached on charges relating to ?200 Astor had given Ward towards the rent on the flat where Rice-Davies lived.
formatting link
So he paid the rent on her flat, with a cheque as it happens, but didn't actually know her.
Yup. All sounds straightforward enough to me
Right. So you've been accused of something in your village of which you're completly innocent, and you've got mobs of villagers outside your house with burning torches, waving their fists and shouting at you to leave.
But that's all water under the bridge as far as you're concerned is it ?
SD1 shouldn't be in the 'bad' list. Stag apart from the engine disaster. Lancia Stratos. Citroen SM. Triumph dolomite sprint. Ford Capri. The fast Escorts were 70s, not 60s.
Some say it was more down to cooling problems. Although the simplex chain drive to the cams isn't the most robust solution. The gear driven water pump just silly.
It can also be down to the contrast from the previous model. Not really surprising the 105E was so well received - replacing an ancient engine and gearbox, etc. The various Cortinas just development.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.