OT The DM is getting concerned about mumsnet

For those few of us whose denial about reading the DM is actually generally true, what is it that the DM doesn't like on mumsnet? Judging by Google, the DM has at least one article on mumsnet every day, and I've no idea which to look at.

Reply to
Roger Hayter
Loading thread data ...

+1
Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

En el artículo , Graeme escribió:

and the front page headline was "Hurrah for the Blackshirts"?

Reply to
Mike Tomlinson

Dave, you're presumably unaware of the great majority of the founders of the KKK being Democrats. A little bit of research now and again wouldn't kill you, would it? Or are you happy to post nonsense regardless and hope no one notices?

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

Churchill warned us over half a century ago that the fascists of the future would style themselves as "anti-fascists" and he was dead right. Very clever and far-sighted bloke, Churchill.

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

But who cares who founded the KKK? What matters is whom are members. You might as well compare modern China with the original founders.

Reply to
dennis

Of course North Korea calls itself democratic too. Nazi included socialist.

Mr Doom must be easy pray for any confidence trickster going.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

They've been doing this for at least 15 years.

formatting link

Reply to
Huge

Cursitor Doom posted

What scandal? I haven't seen any Mumsnet scandal described in this thread, unless you mean posters to Mumsnet using nasty horrible swear words that nobody here would ever use.

Reply to
Handsome Jack

Don't spread fake internet meme baldersash pls. Doesn't make Churchill clever. Just makes you stupid. TW

Reply to
TimW

Mumsnet is divided into those complaining their Esperanto For Gifted Toddle rs books aren't printed in Farrow & Ball colours, and those who you just kn ow are posting in fleecy onesies splattered with crispy pancakes drool (and it's parent drool, not baby drool).

Owain

Reply to
spuorgelgoog

En el artículo , snipped-for-privacy@gowanhill.com escribió:

the sort that think it's ok to go shopping in their local Tesco in their pyjamas?

Reply to
Mike Tomlinson

They may be a step up in that they actually get their lardy arses out of the house.

Owain

Reply to
spuorgelgoog

Why is there a car manufactuer supporting these by designing a car for them ;-0 I just don't get the ad's aim, surely these peole donlt have the money to b uy a new car if they can't even dress themselves depeding on teh time of da y.

Reply to
whisky-dave

A simple apology will do, something like

'Sorry I posted some made up right wing lies'

There's no need to thank me.

TW

Reply to
TimW

A little bit of research now and again wouldn't kill you, would it? Or are you happy to post nonsense regardless and hope no one notices? TW

Reply to
TimW

But many do - as something said by a famous and generally respected person.

Anything originated by Mr Doom best ignored anyway.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

You've just described a Tory government nicely.

How you you equate things like the EU directive on working hours with the desires of corporate bosses?

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Because corporate bosses in EU countries that already had strong employee welfare legislation didn't want to be uncompetitive compared to countries that hadn't.

Owain

Reply to
spuorgelgoog

Right. Certain EU countries (very few) already have strong employee welfare regulations. So the EU making this universal is somehow following the wishes of employers?

That argument would have more validity if they'd levelled down such regs.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.