OT: Job creation at the jobcentre?

Do you blame Thatcher if your morning cup of tea goes cold before you finish drinking it, too?

Reply to
Adrian
Loading thread data ...

The only reason they don't hold the deeds now is that 99.9% of deeds are redundant, as almost all property is in theory registered with the Land Register, as are all charges on that property. Change of ownership is now acknowledged by flipping a few bits on a computer HD, and sending a letter.

Interestingly, under Shariah law, as the lender is not allowed to charge interest, they do in fact own the property, and rent it to the "purchaser" for a rent which will pay the purchase price back and make a profit for the lender over the period of the notional loan. They are

*not* charging interest on the sum borrowed, as that would be against the law....

You need a really sharp blade to split the differences between the systems in practice.

Reply to
John Williamson

It's a two-way street. A devout Muslim is not permitted to *pay* interest. And I was told that the mandated pilgrimage to Mecca only counts when the pilgrim has no debts. Otherwise it's just a holiday. Also it must be paid for by the pilgrim themselves.

True that. Religion in sharp practice scandal. Hardly news ;)

Reply to
Jethro_uk

I think the current figure is 80% of property is registered.

JGH

Reply to
jgh

Less than 70%, by area, as of 2008.

formatting link

The Land Registry say "approximately 20%" not, but no indication if that's by number of properties or by area.

formatting link

I'd suspect for mortgaged properties it's a considerably higher %age, probably near-as-dammit 100%.

Reply to
Adrian

It would be much more fun to challenge with "you are a Mail reader/believer and I claim my 5 euros", wouldn't it? :-)

Reply to
polygonum

It sounds like straightforward hire purchase. The 'lender' would however be a landlord and so have all the usual landlordy responsibilities eg gas saf ety check and maintenance which a buyer with a mortgage wouldn't. From that point of view it sounds like a good option if you like the benefits of bei ng a tenant but still want to own the house eventually.

Owain

Reply to
spuorgelgoog

5k deposit? what planet are you living on?
Reply to
philipuk

The every day sign on will be fun for people around here. The nearest office is 20 miles away there is a limited bus service M-F and I think Saturday but definately not Sunday. Or is this "sign on *every* day" not what it actually says but what some, car owning, townie based, wage slave considers to be "every day" ie just Monday to Friday?

Reply to
Dave Liquorice

Nor has the Tories, or pretty much any other political party.

Reply to
Mark

The fact that a landlord could chuck you out of a rental property with only one month's notice and the fact it was virtually impossible to get anything repaired convinced me to stop renting and buy a house.

Renting in the long run must be more expensive than buying because you have to pay the landlord's mortgage and provide him a profit.

Reply to
Mark

If it's your first question then no. Your second question is not worth answering.

Reply to
Mark

+1 Cannot agree more!
Reply to
Attila Bán

This might sound a stupid question, but isn't there a very good chance they're going to have to do precisely that same journey when they actually find work?

Reply to
Adrian

Gawd help us if ever we get a government who DO put "ideology" above practicality.

Reply to
Adrian

you have had them for 30 years mate.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Every day sign on would be a problem for many in rural areas. There are villages around here with one bus a *week* and probably many with no bus service at all.

However I do thing this policy is just for the conference and will not ever get implemented.

Reply to
Mark

Out of which he pays for any maintenance required. You are also free of the worry of any of that, which for some people is important - you can focus on other things in life. Choices, see. On the Continong, lots of people rent and seem to thrive on it.

Reply to
Tim Streater

Only if you're on a rolling contract, because the initial periodic AST has expired.

If you don't want that flexibility from your own end either, then - when the AST comes towards the end - tell the landlord you'd like another year.

Reply to
Adrian

He still makes a profit overall, otherwise he wouldn't do it.

Yes, assuming that maintenance is a worry and the landlord does do it properly.

Renting is for some and not for others but it is not, IMHO, the cheapest option.

Reply to
Mark

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.