The Building Regulations do not cover the distances to a boundary (except for any unprotected area on or facing a boundary and for the fire resistance of the materials) nor access for maintenance or repair.
The Building Regulations do not cover the distances to a boundary (except for any unprotected area on or facing a boundary and for the fire resistance of the materials) nor access for maintenance or repair.
On Friday, February 1, 2013 9:11:22 AM UTC, polygonum wrote: =20
In the '60s my father, a builder,bought a house with a similar gap between= the adjacent properties. The basement was damp and uninhabitable. He cut o= ut and replaced an entire course of bricks in segments, inserting a slate d= amp proof layer. Apparently,he got lots of dead cats out of the gap between= the houses.
GB wrote: (14-foot house)
14 feet? Loads of room. This one's in for planning permission for the second time. Slightly less than 10 feet:
How about this one for sale near me ? It is 8 feet.
Actually counting the bricks its a bit wider, the internal rooms are 8 feet. Simon.
That's the first time I have seen paddle stairs used as the access to the first floor.
Wouldn't fancy getting a wardrobe up there unless twas to be built in situ
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required