No. But *I* can look at most houses closely and come up with more or less the right answers myself. I do this when I first view the place, carrying a ladder in the car just in case, and a camera with a decent lens on a long stick. Then again, I did a course on building construction as part of a quantity surveying course many years ago, and have seen what goes on on site which isn't necessarily what is on the drawings. I can look for and diagnose things like damp patches round cavity wall ties and such, where the mortar's bridging the cavity.
Without that experience, you'd be wanting to pay a professional for a full survey anyway, which should include an energy use check of some sort.
Splitting the odd hair. The price paid for a property is the amount received by the vendor plus all the fees. Either way, the cost is effectively borne by the purchaser, it's just the way it's split.
Most of the suggestions made on the one I had done just before Christmas made good sense for normal use of the flat. It was even more or less right about the payback periods. It didn't take account of the way I use the hot water tank in the airing cupboard as a space heater to warm the bathroom up on cold mornings, then turn the hot water off until the following night, except for top-ups. The jacket that's sitting waiting in the airing cupboard for Spring will be put on before I leave. Where the EPC process could fall down is where the bulding is not of normal tile roof and brick wall construction. It did, or so I've been told, regard a thatched roof as being uninsulated if there wasn't any insulation in the loft space.
Yersss....
I'll not argue except to say that the boilerplate list is there for a reason.
It was suggested that I replace the convector heaters which run on a timer only when I'm home and an hour or so either side with storage heaters, which store up heat when I'm in and let it out while I'm at work, for instance. If someone's in all day, then they make sense.